We performed a comparison between New Relic and Alluvio Aternity based on real PeerSpot user reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Ease of Deployment: New Relic's setup is easy to follow, but may be time-consuming if there are many devices. Alluvio Aternity, on the other hand, is more user-friendly and requires minimal configuration. Aternity's deployment process is relatively quick with the help of one engineer, and maintenance is practically non-existent.
Features: New Relic has a focus on in-depth application information, scalability, and traceability, with synthetic alerts and transparent pricing. Alluvio Aternity, on the other hand, specializes in providing data on machine health and performance, with unique features like DXI for customization and UXI score for measuring user experience.
Pricing: New Relic's cost is a worry for some users due to monthly or yearly licenses and extra charges for added features or data ingestion. Alluvio Aternity's pricing is a mixed bag, with some finding it worthwhile while others believe it to be pricier than other options. However, Aternity's analytics may have a positive effect on IT budgets and increase efficiency.
Service and Support: Despite positive feedback on documentation, New Relic's team has delays when resolving issues. On the other hand, Alluvio Aternity is praised for its highly competent and responsive support, with a dedicated technical team that successfully resolves issues. Assistance is available both locally and overseas.
ROI: New Relic has demonstrated varying levels of success in generating ROI for its users. On the other hand, Alluvio Aternity's ROI is challenging to quantify as it is focused on the expense side of the business.
Comparison Results: New Relic is the preferred solution in this comparison. New Relic offers more versatile features, accurate alert mechanisms, and in-depth application information. Alluvio Aternity provides valuable data on machine health and performance, but lacks detailed performance counters and database monitoring capabilities.
"Desktop monitoring, and being able to understand the performance of applications that runs on the desktop."
"DEM-Q (Digital Experience Management Quadrant) is very useful. This is where they stand out with their dashboard, because it gives us a picture of how our company is doing compared to the other businesses out there."
"The dashboard is very effective."
"The most valuable thing that you get from Aternity is very broad visibility. You get visibility of your network, of your endpoints, of your software usage, your application performance, capacity, in one pane of glass. We had 20 to 30 IT tools, including application performance monitoring, network monitoring, security, endpoint detection, network protection, capacity management, service management — every kind of monitoring you can imagine. But Aternity was always the first place that I turned for anything, because you can see everything in it."
"While it also provides desktop metrics, the main thing we use it for is monitoring our applications."
"Other features we use heavily are the WiFi analyzer, the Skype for Business analyzer, and the troubleshooting functionalities. We also use the Device Health quite religiously here for troubleshooting devices that are unhealthy, when we're talking about things like high CPU or memory consumption, or file system problems within the users' workstations."
"It is useful for working out whether there are any issues in the network or between the endpoints. It is also useful for working out any performance issues. It has been useful for a lot of stuff around Teams. Our customers like to know what's happening with Teams when they call in. It is helpful for easily profiling users. It records all the applications that are being used for each user, and you can see what users are doing. It is very good in terms of performance. You don't have to wait forever to try and get reports or results. It is quite quick to get everything that you need out of the software."
"The most valuable feature is the alerting. As soon as we click on an incident, it takes us directly to the problematic PC. It's a direct solution. We click on an alert and it takes us to the incident details. The details show in different colors, in a graphical representation, and I like that the most."
"What I like best about New Relic APM is its user interface because it's simple. The most valuable feature of New Relic APM is end-to-end monitoring."
"Server uptime is its most valuable feature."
"The most valuable features are the dashboards and tracing."
"The deep insights, which will give you the metrics (not a high level), so we can build out at the database level where the bottleneck is. This has been pretty helpful."
"It is stable and scalable."
"The VPN is one of the solution's most valuable features for us."
"Their technical support is pretty good and responsive. We have a real good relationship with them."
"It is easier to create new dashboards in the New Relic interface, and it is also easier to query if when I want to monitor a different parameter or time duration on my dashboard."
"Its user interface and features should be improved. They don't support new versions of certain Linux editions. That is one of the reasons why we have to move to another solution."
"Integrating the tool with other products is a challenge."
"I would like Alluvio Aternity to be certified by the IRAP for petrol companies in Australia."
"Right now, the user information being displayed by Aternity is received from AD. Ideally, we would like to see integration with other sources for user information, like other databases, so we are not limited to AD."
"When they moved from Version 8 to Version 9, the customers lost so much control of what they could do with the product."
"Potentially, the one thing that could probably help with better levels of enterprise adoption is around creating the application monitoring signatures. That process can be a little bit difficult. If one thing could be simplified a little bit, it would be the application monitoring signature creation process."
"It all comes in pretty nice looking charts and things, but we have a hard time pulling out hard data, which is usually what you'll need if you're trying to be actionable."
"Aternity does provide performance numbers, the data. However, it doesn't tell you what you can do about it. It just presents the facts. How to interpret the data, and how to draw conclusions from a lot of the data, requires knowledge and experience. That's the part that I would hope Aternity can continue to explore and give us that kind of capability."
"It is complicated, especially in how you interpret the data that it provides. If it had a bit more canned, out-of-the-box features, especially some of the reporting features, that would be more useful."
"Some AIOps are missing in New Relic APS, and I would like to see more features in this area."
"Some of our customers see New Relic as a promising product to have, and we would like to deliver it to them. The only way we would be able to do that would be if we had server appliance for clients that we could install in their data centres."
"It is a serious tool and requires a lot of time invested in order to understand how it works."
"Real-user monitoring would be helpful as it would help me to really understand the client-side performance of the application."
"I would like the ability to set up certain dummy accounts and do the actual things that the customer is doing, without impacting the production environment."
"It would help customers if there were an on-premises version available."
"Documentation is one of the biggest things that I have a problem with since its documentation is not clear sometimes."
Alluvio Aternity is ranked 19th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 37 reviews while New Relic is ranked 3rd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 151 reviews. Alluvio Aternity is rated 8.4, while New Relic is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Alluvio Aternity writes "Not only helped us know which devices to refresh, but helped us determine if a refresh was even necessary, with factual data". On the other hand, the top reviewer of New Relic writes "Has a simple user interface and end-to-end monitoring and self-healing features". Alluvio Aternity is most compared with Dynatrace, Nexthink, SysTrack, AppDynamics and ControlUp, whereas New Relic is most compared with Dynatrace, Datadog, Elastic Observability, Grafana and Azure Monitor. See our Alluvio Aternity vs. New Relic report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors and best Mobile APM vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
