• Home
  • athene SaaS [EOL] vs. Hitachi JP1 Performance Management [EOL]

Hitachi JP1 Performance Management [EOL] vs athene SaaS [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
Unranked
In Infrastructure Capacity Planning
Unranked
In Infrastructure Capacity Planning
Comparisons
Also Known As
Hitachi JP1/Performance Management, JPI, PFM
Learn More
Precisely
Hitachi Vantara
Overview

athene Software as a Service (SaaS) allows us to manage the size and the content of the Capacity Management Information System (CMIS) based on various criterias that include: Granularity of data required, Retention period of data, Specific subsystems or classes of data and Data for various systems and/or LPARs. athene SaaS Add Ons consist of Healthcheck, Predicting / Modeling and Reporting.

JP1/Performance Management supports stable system operation throughout all phases (from when problems are identified to when they are resolved) by collecting operational information from targets that range from OSs and databases to various types of applications. You can then use information that you collected to analyze system performance. This product supports both on-premises and cloud environments and can be used to efficiently monitor a wide variety of targets without the use of specialized monitoring tools.
JP1/Performance Management's extensive array of functions includes monitoring functions that send notifications to JP1/Integrated Management when warning signs of possible problems are detected, and reporting functions that are useful for tuning and for investigating the causes of problems based on collected operational data. By continuously collecting operational data and comparing the current data against data from the past, you can identify areas that are likely to become bottlenecks. This allows you to carry out more reliable capacity planning that does not rely on guesswork.

Sample Customers
AIG, Capgemini, Capita, Fujitsu, Deloitte
Information Not Available

athene SaaS [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Infrastructure Capacity Planning while Hitachi JP1 Performance Management [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Infrastructure Capacity Planning. athene SaaS [EOL] is rated 0.0, while Hitachi JP1 Performance Management [EOL] is rated 0.0. On the other hand, athene SaaS [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Hitachi JP1 Performance Management [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best Infrastructure Capacity Planning vendors.

We monitor all Infrastructure Capacity Planning reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.