We performed a comparison between Atlassian Confluence and Workplace by Facebook based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Social Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The templates are a valuable feature. You can make templates. There is a space inside where you can create pages. When you use the template, the page auto-generates text and images. You do not have to think about the structure of your page as well, which I think is a very good thing for a user. Because usually when you're in front of a blank page, it can be a bit dreadful to know where to start."
"The most valuable feature is the accessibility from different sites for different colleagues and the search option."
"The most valuable feature of Atlassian Confluence is the ability to access your files from anywhere."
"The ease of use has been one of the most valuable features. It has a very simple wiki."
"There is a good library of templates for a wide range of needs."
"A simple tool for developers to write and record team decisions explaining the product that they are creating."
"The trial stages, the ability to connect it to Jira, and the ability to export in PDF are all good capabilities."
"It integrates well with other Atlassian products"
"Storage is the best thing about the solution."
"The product was easy to use."
"A full-featured collaboration tool that is as easy to use as Facebook."
"The solution is used as a knowledge platform for sharing knowledge and information that everybody can easily access."
"Atlassian should rethink its withdrawal of the self-hosted version of the product. They only offer cloud-based service or the "datacenter-edition", which is quite expensive for small companies and private users."
"Managing user permissions and credentials could be easier."
"I would like to see integration with Slack."
"The UX is a little bit all over the place."
"The product is considered expensive."
"I'd like to see some improved reporting on usage."
"In the next release, I would like to have the ability to import pictures."
"The standard table capability is substandard and virtually unusable."
"There needs to be a restriction on who can download content."
"The conferencing feature does not work well with multiple parties or locations."
"The product should allow users to assign tasks and automate processes."
"The implementation could be made easier."
Atlassian Confluence is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Social Software with 98 reviews while Workplace by Facebook is ranked 9th in Enterprise Social Software with 4 reviews. Atlassian Confluence is rated 8.2, while Workplace by Facebook is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Atlassian Confluence writes "Good usability, helpful community support, and facilitates well-structured documentation ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Workplace by Facebook writes "A scalable and easy-to-use solution that can be used for internal communication and storage". Atlassian Confluence is most compared with Microsoft Teams, Office 365, Microsoft OneDrive, SharePoint and Zendesk, whereas Workplace by Facebook is most compared with Yammer and SharePoint. See our Atlassian Confluence vs. Workplace by Facebook report.
See our list of best Enterprise Social Software vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Social Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
