We performed a comparison between Atlassian Confluence and Oracle Content Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Liferay and others in Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals)."With Confluence, everything is in one place, so it's easy to find documentation."
"The solution helped us to see where we were going wrong and where we were doing good, and that helped us to make proper decisions"
"It is easy to use."
"The solution is stable."
"It's easy to use and you can create all types of pages."
"The customization that Confluence offers is one of its most useful features. You can customise it based on the specific project you are working on. It also supports multiple languages."
"Collaboration is most valuable. You can upload or create your documents on Confluence and share them with your team members. Your team members also can share documents."
"There is a good library of templates for a wide range of needs."
"It's a comprehensive solution for managing documents within our organization's management framework."
"The user interface is a little bit stale. The file attachments and how they work could be improved. There is also room for improvement when it comes to CDNs."
"It would be interesting if they had graphical templates that allowed typical agile ceremonies to be documented better."
"Atlassian Confluence's old versions consume too much memory, making it an area where optimization is required from an improvement perspective."
"Some aspects of the drawing perspective could be improved. When we upgrade a design and make technical architecture drawings to publish, we still use Visio first and then copy and paste it. If this feature were available on Confluence, it would be a useful tool."
"Confluence could incorporate stronger records management and automation features. The current management structure is too open, which becomes an issue."
"The solution is not very user-friendly."
"There are some issues with performance when creating tables."
"I would like to see integration with Slack."
"Oracle Content Management poses complexities in initial implementation and configuration."
Atlassian Confluence is ranked 2nd in Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) with 98 reviews while Oracle Content Management is ranked 11th in Enterprise Content Management with 2 reviews. Atlassian Confluence is rated 8.2, while Oracle Content Management is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Atlassian Confluence writes "Good usability, helpful community support, and facilitates well-structured documentation ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Content Management writes "Streamlines document management and enhances collaboration through its robust features and intuitive interface". Atlassian Confluence is most compared with Microsoft Teams, Office 365, Microsoft OneDrive, SharePoint and Zendesk, whereas Oracle Content Management is most compared with Oracle WebCenter, SharePoint, Adobe Experience Manager, Microsoft OneDrive and Alfresco.
We monitor all Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
