We performed a comparison between Atlassian Confluence and Symphony based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Social Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Confluence is easy to use and integrate with other solutions, including social media platforms."
"Atlassian Confluence's most valuable features are the ease in which you can use the tool, the flexibility in creating folder structures, receiving notifications in case others put remarks on the documents, and working together on documents."
"It's easy to search for information."
"This solution allowed us to easily input details beyond just text, such as creating basic data charts to monitor team performance."
"The most valuable feature of Atlassian Confluence it's very easy to use and there are different options."
"It has a very intuitive user interface, which every user able to manage the basic functionality of a PC will be able to work with and produce quite satisfactory results."
"There is a good library of templates for a wide range of needs."
"The solution helped us to see where we were going wrong and where we were doing good, and that helped us to make proper decisions"
"The overall functions are good."
"Symphony and Laravel are the most comfortable frameworks for any developer. It is also lightweight."
"I found the RAM Commander module in Symphony to be the most valuable."
"The entire product is good."
"The solution is user-friendly, and it is very good security-wise."
"RAM usage seems to be higher than it should be."
"Atlassian Confluence could improve the stability, there are timeouts sometimes."
"When we import the data in Confluence from Word or any other document, the formatting is not correct."
"The standard table capability is substandard and virtually unusable."
"We would like there to be more advanced data manipulation features available in this solution, such as creating more complex charts, and a column freezing option."
"There is room for improvement in maybe the tree structure for articles. If you have a lot of articles, it becomes difficult to navigate."
"There is room for improvement in terms of pricing."
"The scalability for larger companies could be improved."
"The area that needs to be improved is modular asset management. When we are uploading the assets in bulk, it is not aligned."
"Compared to established vendors, it lacks user flexibility and customization, especially in the PM module."
"The solution needs to improve CI."
"The solution is very expensive, and its pricing could be improved."
"To improve the situation, enhancing the functionality for integrating with other applications and addressing ticketing issues is crucial."
Atlassian Confluence is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Social Software with 99 reviews while Symphony is ranked 8th in Enterprise Social Software with 5 reviews. Atlassian Confluence is rated 8.2, while Symphony is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of Atlassian Confluence writes "Good usability, helpful community support, and facilitates well-structured documentation ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Symphony writes "Makes tasks like network planning and performance monitoring much easier". Atlassian Confluence is most compared with Microsoft Teams, Office 365, Microsoft OneDrive, SharePoint and Zendesk, whereas Symphony is most compared with Microsoft Teams, Slack, Drupal and SharePoint. See our Atlassian Confluence vs. Symphony report.
See our list of best Enterprise Social Software vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Social Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
