Compare AWS CodeCommit vs. Atlassian SourceTree

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Atlassian SourceTree Logo
2,139 views|1,893 comparisons
AWS CodeCommit Logo
1,910 views|1,874 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, GitHub, Liquibase and others in Version Control. Updated: May 2021.
511,607 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"There is a fee for using SourceTree."

More Atlassian SourceTree Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.
511,607 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The most valuable feature is the ability to fix a broken repository merge.
Top Answer: For everyday use, I am more comfortable using the command line interface, rather than using SourceTree. The way our system works for software deployment, having to install this product is… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
4th
out of 14 in Version Control
Views
2,139
Comparisons
1,893
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
626
Rating
8.0
8th
out of 14 in Version Control
Views
1,910
Comparisons
1,874
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
CodeCommit
Learn More
Overview
Atlassian SourceTree SourceTree, A fully-featured GUI that offers an efficient, consistent development process right out of the box, a Git and Mercurial desktop client. SourceTree supports Git LFS, allowing teams to track large assets in one single place. The Smart branching with SourceTree and Git-flow is keeping repositories clean and development efficient. SourceTree allows you to search for and clone remote repositories within its simple user interface. It provides Search for commits, file changes, and branches right, interactive rebase tool and Submodules making life easier when managing projects, their dependencies, and other project groupings.

AWS CodeCommit is a fully-managed source control service that hosts secure Git-based repositories. It makes it easy for teams to collaborate on code in a secure and highly scalable ecosystem. CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Offer
Learn more about Atlassian SourceTree
Learn more about AWS CodeCommit
Sample Customers
Facebook, NASA, Cisco, eBay, Redfin, Toyota, Kaiser Permanente, Gilt, CSIRO, Autodesk, The Daily Telegraph, CODE, Illumnia,
Edmunds, Gett, ClicksMob
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider23%
Computer Software Company22%
Financial Services Firm7%
Government6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company21%
Comms Service Provider20%
Media Company14%
Energy/Utilities Company6%
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, GitHub, Liquibase and others in Version Control. Updated: May 2021.
511,607 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Atlassian SourceTree is ranked 4th in Version Control with 1 review while AWS CodeCommit is ranked 8th in Version Control. Atlassian SourceTree is rated 8.0, while AWS CodeCommit is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Atlassian SourceTree writes "User-friendly, easy to scale, and it helps to fix problems with our code repository". On the other hand, Atlassian SourceTree is most compared with GitHub, Bitbucket, Bitbucket Server, Git and IBM Rational ClearCase, whereas AWS CodeCommit is most compared with Bitbucket, GitHub, Bitbucket Server and Liquibase.

See our list of best Version Control vendors.

We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.