We performed a comparison between Atlassian SourceTree and Bitbucket based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Version Control solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution's initial setup process is straightforward."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to fix a broken repository merge."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The interface is very good and is easy to use. It tells you when you've committed, when you've uploaded, and gives you the differences."
"Bitbucket is definitely a tool to consider if somebody is still on CVS. It is a great tool and well integrated with Bamboo."
"It is easy to write code and store it in the central repository."
"It's straightforward to adapt to, with user-friendly features and a convenient UI."
"The solution is easy to use. If I need to check out my latest code or I need to send my local code to the depositories it is simple. Overall it is has been a good experience from my side using this solution."
"You can use Bitbucket to whitelist IP addresses during deployment."
"The most valuable feature of Bitbucket is you can see the differences between the fresh code and the old code before you merge. Additionally, the solution is easy to use and well-integrated."
"The version control feature for our code and the security aspect is valuable to us."
"The setup of Bitbucket is simple."
"The product's UI needs improvement."
"For everyday use, I am more comfortable using the command line interface, rather than using SourceTree."
"Its interface could be easy to understand for a programmer."
"I have had a food experience with Atlassian SourceTree but it might not be for everyone."
"I think the configuration can be improved because it is getting more complicated and not very well organized."
"I rate Bitbucket five out of 10 for affordability. It isn't cheap."
"Bitbucket should come with code review pre-integrated, which would be better than integrating another tool into the solution."
"Bitbucket's stability isn't flawless. It has crashed on me occasionally, but I haven't yet lost anything after a crash."
"Bitbucket should consider having a CI/CD if they don’t have it already."
"Bitbucket can improve by integrating a tool to manage conflict code. This would save time."
"The tool offers a limited pipeline structure."
"I would like to see the tool's desktop version."
Atlassian SourceTree is ranked 6th in Version Control with 5 reviews while Bitbucket is ranked 1st in Version Control with 42 reviews. Atlassian SourceTree is rated 7.2, while Bitbucket is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Atlassian SourceTree writes "An easy-to-setup solution, but its documentation could be better for technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Bitbucket writes "It's a good solution for storing code, but the usability and integration could be better". Atlassian SourceTree is most compared with Git, GitHub, Bitbucket Server and AWS CodeCommit, whereas Bitbucket is most compared with Bitbucket Server, AWS CodeCommit, GitHub, Liquibase and IBM Rational ClearCase. See our Atlassian SourceTree vs. Bitbucket report.
See our list of best Version Control vendors.
We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.