We performed a comparison between Atlassian SourceTree and GitHub based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Version Control solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is the ability to fix a broken repository merge."
"The solution's initial setup process is straightforward."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The interface is very good and is easy to use. It tells you when you've committed, when you've uploaded, and gives you the differences."
"The most valuable feature is help offered by the community for open-source projects."
"GitHub is the best tool for source repositories."
"Any complex banking can be handled very easily in GitHub. It allows us to integrate with tools like Grid, where we can merge and resolve conflicts without any hassle."
"The flexibility of this solution has been most valuable. It operates on a pay per use basis where you can ramp up or decrease usage."
"The best feature is the ability to track the history of all code changes, and it's easy to use. Additionally, as it's open source, anyone can use that feature resulting in distributed development. This opens the door to collaboration with different code and developer, feature, and master branches of development."
"GitHub is pure or open-source; you can access it anywhere. You can have a lot of collateral information. You can make the changes and do the reviews from one place."
"During our use of GitHub, we have not encountered any problems and GitHub adds new features frequently."
"All the features are valuable, but the most important feature is that GitHub has advanced security. The second important feature is the capability to create custom GitHub actions and the capability to deploy in different types of architectural infrastructures, such as hybrid, private, or public."
"Its interface could be easy to understand for a programmer."
"I have had a food experience with Atlassian SourceTree but it might not be for everyone."
"The product's UI needs improvement."
"For everyday use, I am more comfortable using the command line interface, rather than using SourceTree."
"This solution could be improved by offering crowd sourced support where we could ask questions to other users."
"There is room for improvement in terms of interface."
"We are not able to access GitHub from our VPN."
"Could be more user friendly."
"I cannot recall coming across any shortcomings of the product."
"GitHub storage is one of the main requirements and it could improve."
"I would like a more graphical, user-friendly UI, to avoid writing so much code on cmd."
"The GitHub repository needs an upgraded user interface and overall UI improvements."
Atlassian SourceTree is ranked 5th in Version Control with 5 reviews while GitHub is ranked 2nd in Version Control with 64 reviews. Atlassian SourceTree is rated 7.2, while GitHub is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Atlassian SourceTree writes "An easy-to-setup solution, but its documentation could be better for technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of GitHub writes "Beneficial version control and continuous integration, but guides would be helpful". Atlassian SourceTree is most compared with Git, Bitbucket, Bitbucket Server, AWS CodeCommit and Tower, whereas GitHub is most compared with Snyk, AWS CodeCommit, Bitbucket, Fortify on Demand and Checkmarx. See our Atlassian SourceTree vs. GitHub report.
See our list of best Version Control vendors.
We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.