Compare Atoll Technologies System Architecture Management Utility vs. Avolution ABACUS

Atoll Technologies System Architecture Management Utility is ranked 13th in Architecture Management with 1 review while Avolution ABACUS is ranked 8th in Architecture Management with 3 reviews. Atoll Technologies System Architecture Management Utility is rated 8.0, while Avolution ABACUS is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of Atoll Technologies System Architecture Management Utility writes "A stable scalable solution with mid-range price points". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Avolution ABACUS writes "Powerful and customizable, but the interface needs to be more user-friendly and it needs dashboards". Atoll Technologies System Architecture Management Utility is most compared with , whereas Avolution ABACUS is most compared with Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, ARIS BPM and iServer.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Find out what your peers are saying about Sparx Systems, Planview, IDERA and others in Architecture Management. Updated: November 2019.
384,324 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The solution is stable. We haven't had any serious technical issues.

Read more »

The most valuable feature is the traceability, you can trace any object to the other.If you face new challenges or issues then you can dynamically customize according to the business needs.

Read more »

Cons
The user interface needs improvement. The solution needs to add a few features to improve the overall user experience. Security needs to be strengthened as well.

Read more »

While this is one of the most powerful tools on the market it does not integrate well with Microsoft Office or others.If they want to expand in the European market then they are going to have to improve their technical support.It is vastly scalable but you can't run it on a Mac or Linux so it has limitations.The most valuable features are the catalog and the diagram.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
This solution is expensive for some people's budgets and they need to offer a Lite version at a cheaper price

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Architecture Management solutions are best for your needs.
384,324 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
13th
Views
105
Comparisons
29
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
202
Avg. Rating
8.0
8th
Views
2,493
Comparisons
1,309
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
581
Avg. Rating
6.7
Top Comparisons
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Also Known As
System Architecture Management Utility
Learn
Atoll Technologies
Video Not Available
Avolution
Overview
Atoll Technologies System Architecture Management Utility (SAMU) generates compelling diagrams about EA, is a true repository, which comes with best practice meta-model, report definitions and settings and provides the right platform to model the dynamism of the environment and manage transformation from planning to completion. SAMU provides seamless communication that develop a common understanding about architecture and share knowledge which provides complexity that is presented simply on a straight-forward, query-based and auto-generated diagrams.ABACUS is designed to provide the quickest time-to-value of any enterprise architecture tool. Build and maintain rich visual models from existing company data. ABACUS comes with standard industry frameworks as well as advanced analytic tools and best-in-class roadmapping and reporting functionality.
Offer
Learn more about Atoll Technologies System Architecture Management Utility
Learn more about Avolution ABACUS
Sample Customers
Waterworks of BudapestBarclays
Find out what your peers are saying about Sparx Systems, Planview, IDERA and others in Architecture Management. Updated: November 2019.
384,324 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Architecture Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email