Compare Atoll Technologies System Architecture Management Utility vs. erwin Evolve

Atoll Technologies System Architecture Management Utility is ranked 14th in Architecture Management with 1 review while erwin Evolve is ranked 3rd in Architecture Management with 10 reviews. Atoll Technologies System Architecture Management Utility is rated 8.0, while erwin Evolve is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Atoll Technologies System Architecture Management Utility writes "A stable scalable solution with mid-range price points". On the other hand, the top reviewer of erwin Evolve writes "Enables us to present data and objects visually, in diagrams, and to make them available via the web". Atoll Technologies System Architecture Management Utility is most compared with , whereas erwin Evolve is most compared with SAP PowerDesigner, IDERA ER Studio and Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Atoll Technologies System Architecture Management Utility? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Sparx Systems, Planview, erwin, Inc. and others in Architecture Management. Updated: May 2020.
417,925 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The solution is stable. We haven't had any serious technical issues.

Read more »

There is a model behind it. It's really nice that the Evolve front-end, as it builds a website, keeps those relationships in mind. You can even go to a procedure and see all the applications that are related to it. Then you can go into that application and see all the standard operating procedures that that application is a part of. It's just very connected.I have not seen capabilities for web-sharing and interaction with the architecture from any other supplier. It's a great capability...By placing the data and the metadata into a model, which is what the tool does, you gain the abilities for linkages between different objects in the model, linkages that you cannot get on paper or with Visio or PowerPoint. That is a huge discriminator.The feature that stands out for me is the ease of configuring objects and the screens to show them. It's really easy to add a new type of object in this reference. Creating a new type of object, using it, and evolving it a little bit in terms of what we can document about it are the main features that made us decide to use this provider.I can send images in the PDF form, along with the relationships and the associations that are a very important part of what we do. It can show what is affected and what is impacted by a certain change in one area of the system architecture or enterprise architecture. I can very quickly draw those issues and topics to the fore.We use erwin Evolve to publish to the website. This allows us to enable publishing our website using parameterisation features. In a very fast, quick way, we can publish a table or chart onto a website.One of the most valuable features is the website that sits on top of the database. There's a database of objects and how they are related, and you can make views and diagrams and visual elements out of that information on the website. The website is the part that is called Evolve and we use the Evolve Designer and publish the website out to our employees. They can click around and navigate and search, etc.The ability to share and collaborate on the solution is its most valuable feature.

Read more »

Cons
The user interface needs improvement. The solution needs to add a few features to improve the overall user experience. Security needs to be strengthened as well.

Read more »

I would like it to be easier to make changes and then deploy them into production, especially when you have multiple web servers or front-ends. It would be nice to make a change and then have it propagate to the production servers in a more automated fashion.With the Excel importing, the "up to date" part is the challenge. If we had a real-time integration, we could keep things up to date for whatever kinds of change points we had. With Excel, it is more that you have to export from one system then import it to another, so it's better for data that doesn't change that often.They have improved the search engine a little bit but it can always be improved more. The more data you put inside it, the more you want to use it.The solution's integration capabilities with other tools in our system has not been all that well done. We have people who use ARIS, who use System Architect and, of course, Visio. erwin has very limited ways to import and export from those kinds of tools. It's not a very easy thing to do.The way that we are using it for application management, we have several KPIs. We want to follow and monitor them regarding a number of solutions. We cannot calculate this today. We would like real-time calculations along with the KPIs in order to improve the user experience. We would like the tool to be able to display this, not only as signals, but as charts.What they need to do is to consolidate more of their products. For example, I was just looking and I couldn't figure out what erwin DT is. It's on the website but it would help if they could put information together and make it more clear as to what products they have and how they work with other things.The solution needs to focus on allowing for more integrations.I would like to see an improvement in the output of the solution.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
The licensing enables you to differentiate between people who edit the content and the people who consume it. We are able to keep the licensing costs down by keeping the "contributor" licenses to a minimum, and we then just roll out the content in a read-only version for the rest of our users.Yearly, our cost is €100,000.The cost is something like $15,000, per license. But I haven't looked at those numbers in three years. It was over $100,000 to initially set everything up and get it all configured.On a yearly basis, our licensing costs are 50,000 euro. There are no additional costs because we are on a SaaS model.I estimate that we pay between $40,000 and $50,000 a year for the solution, not including the upfront costs to buy things the first time.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Architecture Management solutions are best for your needs.
417,925 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
14th
Views
107
Comparisons
30
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
202
Avg. Rating
8.0
3rd
Views
5,441
Comparisons
4,128
Reviews
10
Average Words per Review
1,142
Avg. Rating
8.0
Top Comparisons
Compared 33% of the time.
Compared 31% of the time.
Also Known As
System Architecture Management Utilityerwin EA, erwin Business Process, erwin Enterprise Architecture
Learn
Atoll Technologies
Video Not Available
erwin, Inc.
Overview
Atoll Technologies System Architecture Management Utility (SAMU) generates compelling diagrams about EA, is a true repository, which comes with best practice meta-model, report definitions and settings and provides the right platform to model the dynamism of the environment and manage transformation from planning to completion. SAMU provides seamless communication that develop a common understanding about architecture and share knowledge which provides complexity that is presented simply on a straight-forward, query-based and auto-generated diagrams.

erwin is used by more than 50,000 professionals in 60+ countries to get big results from their enterprise data initiatives. erwin is the #1 choice in virtually every industry, from government and healthcare to retail and finance.

erwin Modeling provides a collaborative environment to manage enterprise data through an intuitive, graphical interface. With a centralized view of key data definitions, you can leverage information as a strategic asset and more efficiently manage your data resources to save time and money.

Offer
Learn more about Atoll Technologies System Architecture Management Utility
Learn more about erwin Evolve
Sample Customers
Waterworks of BudapestAT&T, Bank of America, Chevron, Duke University, ESPN, Fidelity, GE, JP Morgan Chase, KPMG, McGraw Hill, NASA, Pfizer, Royal Bank of Scotland, Teradata, Union Pacific, Vodafone, Wells Fargo.
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Comms Service Provider13%
Recruiting/Hr Firm13%
Pharma/Biotech Company13%
Insurance Company13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company28%
Comms Service Provider11%
Insurance Company10%
Government8%
Find out what your peers are saying about Sparx Systems, Planview, erwin, Inc. and others in Architecture Management. Updated: May 2020.
417,925 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Architecture Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.