We performed a comparison between Atoll Technologies System Architecture Management Utility and Sparx Pro Cloud Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about LeanIX, Sparx Systems, erwin by Quest and others in Enterprise Architecture Management."The solution is stable. We haven't had any serious technical issues."
More Atoll Technologies System Architecture Management Utility Pros →
"The solution's most valuable feature is ArchiMate which I use daily."
"We have found the technical support to be helpful."
"The user interface needs improvement. The solution needs to add a few features to improve the overall user experience. Security needs to be strengthened as well."
More Atoll Technologies System Architecture Management Utility Cons →
"The user-friendliness could be even better."
"The solution should allow easier access with enhanced customization options for web page DHTML."
Earn 20 points
Atoll Technologies System Architecture Management Utility is ranked 32nd in Enterprise Architecture Management while Sparx Pro Cloud Server is ranked 14th in Enterprise Architecture Management with 3 reviews. Atoll Technologies System Architecture Management Utility is rated 8.0, while Sparx Pro Cloud Server is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Atoll Technologies System Architecture Management Utility writes "A stable scalable solution with mid-range price points". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sparx Pro Cloud Server writes "Scalable and reasonably priced with good technical support". Atoll Technologies System Architecture Management Utility is most compared with , whereas Sparx Pro Cloud Server is most compared with Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, SAP PowerDesigner and Sparx Prolaborate.
See our list of best Enterprise Architecture Management vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Architecture Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.