We performed a comparison between Atos DirX Directory and Oracle Identity Governance based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure."DirX Directory is the best feature of the product: a very fast, stable LDAP directory."
"The solution offers high performance."
"The most valuable feature is its knowledge."
"The role and attribute-based access control has been greatly improved."
"It has a very good response time."
"I am able to request any access rights I need."
"The most valuable features in Oracle Identity Governance are identity and access management."
"It helps provision the required accesses through policies, approvals, and whatever would be the business requirement."
"It's a stable and scalable solution."
"Understanding what a customer is using, what they are looking for, and allowing permissions is a challenge. We use the information we get in order to understand the behavior of the customer beyond the security and to understand what they have been doing in the last month. It's a nice way to understand what is attracting the customer and what they are clicking. That could be implemented by using this kind of application."
"Oracle Identity manager is the best tool in the market for access managers."
"The most important feature is the connectors. Without the connectors, it can do nothing."
"The Self-Service Portal is old school and it lacks easy accessibility for users."
"An overall modernization of the product is required in order to keep up with newer products."
"Needs more available consultants and implementation partners."
"The price could be better. It would be better if they developed a better endpoint solution in the next release."
"The user interface could be more convenient for people that don't know the tool too intensively."
"It would be great if the Oracle Fusion Middleware team worked on making it compatible with other application servers, as it exists in OIM9.x."
"Our issues with the solution have to do with the integration with different applications. It's not easy to connect ICAO to this kind of product. It would be better to work on the extensions of the adapters for this kind of identity management solution in order to not put in the code in the product."
"One of the areas that need some improvement with Oracle specifically is the ease of implementation."
"They need to improve their backup strategy."
"Oracle Identity Governance can capture a lot of loads, it's stable. However, we once had a problem two years ago, but it is now resolved. There are some issues still present, but they're operational. They don't impact the customers. There are some improvements that can be done."
"Automation of validation exercises performed by humans over Recon Exceptions generated as a result of an access synchronization event over a user's need for access or not."
"I have yet to see its full functionality exercised in my organization."
"The user interface experience needs to be improved."
Atos DirX Directory is ranked 18th in Application Infrastructure with 4 reviews while Oracle Identity Governance is ranked 10th in Identity Management (IM) with 66 reviews. Atos DirX Directory is rated 6.8, while Oracle Identity Governance is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Atos DirX Directory writes "An identity management system with valuable knowledge". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Identity Governance writes "A scalable solution designed to meet the requirements of medium and large-sized companies". Atos DirX Directory is most compared with One Identity Manager and CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, whereas Oracle Identity Governance is most compared with SailPoint IdentityIQ, One Identity Manager, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Microsoft Identity Manager and Saviynt.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.