Compare Atos Novascale Gcos vs. IBM Z Systems
Most Helpful Review | |||
Use Atos Novascale Gcos? Share your opinion. |
| ||
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mainframes solutions are best for your needs. 456,812 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Ranking  | |
Views 65 Comparisons 24 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Rating N/A | Views 743 Comparisons 641 Reviews 1 Average Words per Review 58 Rating 10.0 |
Popular Comparisons | |
 Compared 53% of the time.  Compared 24% of the time.  Compared 15% of the time. Compared 4% of the time. | |
Learn | |
| Atos | IBM |
Overview | |
IBM Z mainframes deliver millisecond response time, extreme reliability, near 100% uptime and the world’s best security. The newest mainframe, IBM z14 (z14), is designed for trusted digital experiences. This enterprise system delivers pervasive encryption, stronger clouds, real time insights, machine learning and transparent blockchain. | |
Offer | |
Learn more about Atos Novascale Gcos | Learn more about IBM Z Systems |
Sample Customers | |
| FunderMax, Microsoft, University of Tasmania, Red Hat OpenShift, AdvantageCare Physicians | Fujitsu |
Atos Novascale Gcos is ranked 6th in Mainframes while IBM Z Systems is ranked 1st in Mainframes with 1 review. Atos Novascale Gcos is rated 0.0, while IBM Z Systems is rated 10.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Z Systems writes "Provides processing of mission critical applications". Atos Novascale Gcos is most compared with , whereas IBM Z Systems is most compared with IBM LinuxONE, Fujitsu Server GS21, Unisys ClearPath Dorado and Unisys ClearPath Libra.
See our list of best Mainframes vendors.
We monitor all Mainframes reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.