• Home
  • Atos SAP Services vs. IBM SAP Services

Atos SAP Services vs IBM SAP Services comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Atos Logo

Atos SAP Services

96 views|68 comparisons
IBM Logo

IBM SAP Services

415 views|320 comparisons
Ranking
13th
out of 31 in SAP Service Providers
Views
96
Comparisons
68
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
2nd
out of 31 in SAP Service Providers
Views
415
Comparisons
320
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Learn More
Atos
IBM
Video Not Available
Overview
Information Not Available
IBM Global Business Services provides comprehensive transformational consulting on SAP solutions, including, but not limited to, SAP Hybris, SAP SuccessFactors and SAP S/4HANA. IBM has the expertise necessary to maximize your SAP investment by offering guidance in areas such as high-level business design, IT strategy and implementation, end-to-end application life cycle management and more.
Sample Customers
Steinel GmbH
Kraft Heinz, Compass Group India, Kennametal, British American Tobacco
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Manufacturing Company32%
Educational Organization10%
University8%
Computer Software Company6%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business10%
Midsize Enterprise8%
Large Enterprise82%

Atos SAP Services is ranked 13th in SAP Service Providers while IBM SAP Services is ranked 2nd in SAP Service Providers. Atos SAP Services is rated 0.0, while IBM SAP Services is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Atos SAP Services is most compared with , whereas IBM SAP Services is most compared with Deloitte SAP Services, Capgemini SAP Services, Accenture SAP Services and PWC SAP Services.

See our list of best SAP Service Providers vendors.

We monitor all SAP Service Providers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.