Compare AttackIQ vs. CyCognito

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
AttackIQ Logo
1,299 views|751 comparisons
CyCognito Logo
355 views|172 comparisons
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) solutions are best for your needs.
475,208 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Overall, I've had a good experience with the product. It's worked well for me.
Top Answer: I can't think of any features that are lacking just now. It does everything I need it to do. I don't have too much experience with the solution. I need more time to really study the solution to see if… more »
Top Answer: I primarily use the solution for my own personal projects. It's a BAS - Breach and Attack Simulation.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
1,299
Comparisons
751
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
366
Rating
7.0
Views
355
Comparisons
172
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Learn More
CyCognito
Video Not Available
Overview

The AttackIQ platform enables continuous validation that your security controls, processes and people are working as intended and delivering ROI. It seamlessly integrates into any existing network, delivering immediate visibility into your security program so you can uncover gaps in coverage, identify misconfigurations, and quickly prioritize remediation efforts.

Legacy security testing approaches may help security teams find and remediate risks on-premises and directly managed infrastructure. But, they are no match for the rapidly expanding attack surface caused by modern, highly distributed IT ecosystems.

CyCognito was founded by veterans of national intelligence agencies who understand how attackers exploit blind spots, and who recognized the need for a radical new approach to threat assessment. Our mission is to build the next-generation security risk assessment product category: solutions that autonomously discover, enumerate, and prioritize each organization’s security risks based upon a global analysis of all external attack surfaces and attack vectors that a real attacker would likely exploit.

Offer
Learn more about AttackIQ
Learn more about CyCognito
Sample Customers
Information Not Available
UTA, BERTELSMANN, WIPRO
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company24%
Comms Service Provider21%
Government7%
Financial Services Firm7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider28%
Computer Software Company18%
Manufacturing Company13%
Financial Services Firm13%

AttackIQ is ranked 2nd in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) with 1 review while CyCognito is ranked 8th in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS). AttackIQ is rated 7.0, while CyCognito is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of AttackIQ writes "Overall, a good user experience and works well but is hard to set up". On the other hand, AttackIQ is most compared with Verodin, Cymulate, SafeBreach, Picus Security and Guardicore Infection Monkey, whereas CyCognito is most compared with Cymulate and SafeBreach.

See our list of best Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) vendors.

We monitor all Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.