We performed a comparison between AttackIQ and Cymulate based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Pentera, Cymulate, Picus Security and others in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)."Overall, I've had a good experience with the product. It's worked well for me."
"The reporting capabilities are very good."
"The most valuable feature for us is the zero-day."
"The initial setup was quite difficult and took a long time."
"The product must provide consultancy for initial setup."
"The reporting process requires significant improvement as it often takes longer than expected and the quality is lacking."
Earn 20 points
AttackIQ is ranked 7th in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) while Cymulate is ranked 2nd in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) with 2 reviews. AttackIQ is rated 7.0, while Cymulate is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of AttackIQ writes "Overall, a good user experience and works well but is hard to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cymulate writes "An affordable solution that improves an organization’s security posture and provides excellent reporting capabilities". AttackIQ is most compared with Pentera, Picus Security, SafeBreach, XM Cyber and Verodin, whereas Cymulate is most compared with Pentera, Picus Security, XM Cyber, SafeBreach and Mandiant Advantage.
See our list of best Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) vendors.
We monitor all Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
