Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
AttackIQ Logo
1,973 views|1,309 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Pentera Logo
5,003 views|3,285 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AttackIQ and Pentera based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Pentera, Cymulate, Picus Security and others in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS).
To learn more, read our detailed Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Overall, I've had a good experience with the product. It's worked well for me."

More AttackIQ Pros →

"The product is easy to use.""Maybe there are some remediation steps on the website, we can mask sensitive information on the website better.""The most valuable feature of Pentera is that you can do continuous vulnerability assessment, which is automated.""The vulnerability scanner, exploit achievements, and remediation actions are all great.""What I like the most about Pentera is its solution-oriented approach."

More Pentera Pros →

Cons
"The initial setup was quite difficult and took a long time."

More AttackIQ Cons →

"Pentera's general dashboards could be improved and made more specific in terms of vulnerabilities that I'm discovering.""The vulnerability scanner, exploit achievements, and remediation actions are all great.""There is room for improvement in virtualization compatibility.""Maybe scalability. I know that the Pentera right now is high level in order to scan big deals over 500 IPs and not less, and not less. That can be more granular. This will be useful.""The price could be improved."

More Pentera Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "We have to pay a yearly licensing cost for Pentera."
  • "It's not that expensive, but it could be more cost-effective."
  • More Pentera Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:The solution is used for test simulation. It simulates tests on all our servers to know the vulnerabilities in them.
    Ranking
    Views
    1,973
    Comparisons
    1,309
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    5,003
    Comparisons
    3,285
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    321
    Rating
    8.3
    Comparisons
    Picus Security logo
    Compared 17% of the time.
    SafeBreach logo
    Compared 16% of the time.
    Cymulate logo
    Compared 16% of the time.
    XM Cyber logo
    Compared 8% of the time.
    Verodin logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    Cymulate logo
    Compared 19% of the time.
    Tenable Nessus logo
    Compared 16% of the time.
    Picus Security logo
    Compared 10% of the time.
    Horizon3.ai logo
    Compared 10% of the time.
    vPentest logo
    Compared 3% of the time.
    Learn More
    Overview

    The AttackIQ platform enables continuous validation that your security controls, processes and people are working as intended and delivering ROI. It seamlessly integrates into any existing network, delivering immediate visibility into your security program so you can uncover gaps in coverage, identify misconfigurations, and quickly prioritize remediation efforts.

    Pentera is the category leader for Automated Security Validation, allowing every organization to evaluate its security readiness, to know its real security risk at any given moment. Test all cybersecurity layers across the attack surface – inside and out – by safely emulating attacks & prioritize patching with a risk-based remediation roadmap.

    Thousands of security professionals and service providers around the world use Pentera to guide remediation and close security gaps before they are exploited. For more info visit: pentera.io

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Blackstone Group Caterpillar Apria Healthcare Taylor Vinters Sandler Capital Management Drawbridge BNP Paribas British Red Cross
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government6%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise61%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise61%
    Buyer's Guide
    Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Pentera, Cymulate, Picus Security and others in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS). Updated: April 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    AttackIQ is ranked 7th in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) while Pentera is ranked 1st in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) with 5 reviews. AttackIQ is rated 7.0, while Pentera is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of AttackIQ writes "Overall, a good user experience and works well but is hard to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pentera writes "A stable solution that can be used to do continuous and automated vulnerability assessments". AttackIQ is most compared with Picus Security, SafeBreach, Cymulate, XM Cyber and Verodin, whereas Pentera is most compared with Cymulate, Tenable Nessus, Picus Security, Horizon3.ai and vPentest.

    See our list of best Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) vendors.

    We monitor all Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.