We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Earn 20 points
The AttackIQ platform enables continuous validation that your security controls, processes and people are working as intended and delivering ROI. It seamlessly integrates into any existing network, delivering immediate visibility into your security program so you can uncover gaps in coverage, identify misconfigurations, and quickly prioritize remediation efforts.
Pentera is the category leader for Automated Security Validation, allowing every organization to test with ease the integrity of all cybersecurity layers, unfolding true, current security exposures at any moment, at any scale. Thousands of security professionals and service providers around the world use Pentera to guide remediation and close security gaps before they are exploited. For more info visit: pentera.io.
AttackIQ is ranked 2nd in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) with 1 review while Pentera is ranked 8th in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS). AttackIQ is rated 7.0, while Pentera is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of AttackIQ writes "Overall, a good user experience and works well but is hard to set up". On the other hand, AttackIQ is most compared with Cymulate, Verodin, SafeBreach, Picus Security and XM Cyber HaXM, whereas Pentera is most compared with Cymulate, XM Cyber HaXM, Verodin, SafeBreach and Picus Security.
See our list of best Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) vendors.
We monitor all Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.