We performed a comparison between AttackIQ and Picus Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Pentera, Cymulate, Picus Security and others in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)."Overall, I've had a good experience with the product. It's worked well for me."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its integration capabilities with the other security tools."
"One of the most valuable features would be the detection capability, specifically the ability to detect alarms and logs collected from SIEM tools."
"You have the liberty of physically executing a specific set of rules in your environment."
"It's very useful software because the customer mostly configures their IPS and manages their firewalls, WAF, and the DBS according to the latest update, latest news, or according to the situation."
"The initial setup was quite difficult and took a long time."
"Let's say if a customer's environment has 10 security devices and they need to know that there is an attack that has bypassed their devices, they cannot go and inspect every device and every rule in their security devices."
"The amount of integrations that the product can handle is an area of concern, making it one of the aspects where improvements are required."
"The reporting and data analysis could be improved. Specifically, the analysis of the results."
"According to the attack vectors, you cannot specify which product is failing or which product is working well because there's no agent."
Earn 20 points
AttackIQ is ranked 7th in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) while Picus Security is ranked 3rd in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) with 4 reviews. AttackIQ is rated 7.0, while Picus Security is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of AttackIQ writes "Overall, a good user experience and works well but is hard to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Picus Security writes "Breach and attack simulation software that provides network, endpoint, and email vectors". AttackIQ is most compared with Pentera, SafeBreach, Cymulate, XM Cyber and Verodin, whereas Picus Security is most compared with Pentera, Cymulate, SafeBreach, XM Cyber and Tenable One Exposure Management Platform.
See our list of best Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) vendors.
We monitor all Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
