We performed a comparison between AttackIQ and SafeBreach based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Pentera, Cymulate, Picus Security and others in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)."Overall, I've had a good experience with the product. It's worked well for me."
"The most valuable feature is the reporting database and attack protection."
"The most valuable feature is the huge library of hack attacks and breach methods."
"The initial setup was quite difficult and took a long time."
"I would like to see some integration on the customization and customer support."
"There is room for improvement in the interface. It is not always easy to find the options that you need and not everything is customizable."
Earn 20 points
AttackIQ is ranked 7th in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) while SafeBreach is ranked 6th in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) with 2 reviews. AttackIQ is rated 7.0, while SafeBreach is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AttackIQ writes "Overall, a good user experience and works well but is hard to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SafeBreach writes "Breach and attach simulation solution used to test security tools with a valuable library of hacking data". AttackIQ is most compared with Pentera, Picus Security, Cymulate, XM Cyber and Verodin, whereas SafeBreach is most compared with Picus Security, Cymulate, Pentera, XM Cyber and Verodin.
See our list of best Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) vendors.
We monitor all Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
