Compare Attivo Networks vs. Fidelis Deception

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Attivo Networks Logo
1,820 views|1,452 comparisons
Fidelis Deception Logo
68 views|43 comparisons
Ranking
Views
1,820
Comparisons
1,452
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
68
Comparisons
43
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Learn More
Overview

Stop attackers in their tracks with the real-time detection of threats that have bypassed prevention security systems. The Attivo Networks ThreatMatrix Deception and Response Platform changes the balance of power with sophisticated deception technology that deceives an attacker into revealing themselves. Detailed attack analysis and forensics accelerate incident response and provide protection against future cyber attacks.

Fidelis Deception alerts an organization's cyber terrain by automatically deploying decoys and breadcrumbs that misdirect threats to a deception environment.

Offer
Learn more about Attivo Networks
Learn more about Fidelis Deception
Sample Customers
NSS Labs., Fierce IT security, FireEye
carnival caterpillar, clayton homes, cleveland clinic, emirates, samsung, hanes
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company30%
Comms Service Provider24%
Financial Services Firm6%
Energy/Utilities Company5%
No Data Available

Attivo Networks is ranked 1st in Threat Deception Platforms while Fidelis Deception is ranked 5th in Threat Deception Platforms. Attivo Networks is rated 0.0, while Fidelis Deception is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Attivo Networks is most compared with illusive networks, TrapX Security, Acalvio, Fidelis Elevate and Darktrace, whereas Fidelis Deception is most compared with .

See our list of best Threat Deception Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Threat Deception Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.