We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The pricing is similar to that of other solutions."
"The licensing fees are a little bit high."
Earn 20 points
The proliferation of Internet of Things (IoT) devices, has made it necessary for organizations to improve their visibility into what is attached to their networks. They need to know every device and every user accessing their networks. IoT devices enable digital transformation initiatives and improve efficiency, flexibility, and optimization. However, they are inherently untrustworthy, with designs that prioritize low-cost over security. FortiNAC provides the network visibility to see everything connected to the network, as well as the ability to control those devices and users, including dynamic, automated responses.
Auconet Network Access Control is ranked 18th in Network Access Control (NAC) while Fortinet FortiNAC is ranked 4th in Network Access Control (NAC) with 7 reviews. Auconet Network Access Control is rated 0.0, while Fortinet FortiNAC is rated 8.4. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fortinet FortiNAC writes "Enhances the Security Fabric with visibility, control, and automated response for everything that connects to the network & protection against IoT threats extending control to third-party devices". Auconet Network Access Control is most compared with Forescout Platform, whereas Fortinet FortiNAC is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Aruba ClearPass, Forescout Platform and Portnox CORE.
See our list of best Network Access Control (NAC) vendors.
We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.