Auconet Network Access Control vs McAfee NAC [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Auconet Network Access Control and McAfee NAC [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, HPE Aruba Networking, Forescout and others in Network Access Control (NAC).
To learn more, read our detailed Network Access Control (NAC) Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use McAfee NAC [EOL]?
Ranking
Views
116
Comparisons
50
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Unranked
In Network Access Control (NAC)
Buyer's Guide
Network Access Control (NAC)
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, HPE Aruba Networking, Forescout and others in Network Access Control (NAC). Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Intel Security NAC
Learn More
Auconet
Video Not Available
McAfee
Video Not Available
Overview
Unique among NAC platforms, Auconet Network Access Control is fully multi-tenant capable, making it the perfect complement to existing security measures at data centers operated by external service providers. In addition, it provides security over endpoints across the company, protecting the data center by protecting the overall network.

McAfee Unified Secure Access is the world’s first network access control (NAC) solution to unify endpoint and network security with access control and policy auditing. Unlike many existing NAC solutions, McAfee’s integrated solution secures against threats inside and outside the network while remaining simple, cost-effective, accurate, scalable, and secure. It expands your security posture with Adaptive Policy Technology that combines multiple assessment and control features into one NAC solution. It controls access and protects against broad threats with application-based and identity-based technologies, which control who has access to your specific critical network resources. Furthermore, Unified Secure Access protects your investment by leveraging your existing network and system components and taking advantage of McAfee’s integrated management through McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator (ePO).

Sample Customers
Krone, DHL, Toll Collect, Reise Bank, BASF, T Systems, ING, Saint Martin's University, Euronet Worldwide, Muller, Uniqa
State of Alaska
Buyer's Guide
Network Access Control (NAC)
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, HPE Aruba Networking, Forescout and others in Network Access Control (NAC). Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Auconet Network Access Control is ranked 19th in Network Access Control (NAC) while McAfee NAC [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Network Access Control (NAC). Auconet Network Access Control is rated 8.0, while McAfee NAC [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Auconet Network Access Control writes "A very good Network Access Control application with emphasis on MAC layer authentication". On the other hand, Auconet Network Access Control is most compared with , whereas McAfee NAC [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best Network Access Control (NAC) vendors.

We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.