We performed a comparison between AuraQuantic and Camunda based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's a low-code application."
"AuraPortal has the best price for its process."
"AuraPortal is very user-friendly and flexible."
"AuraQuantic's most valuable features are the zero code, user-friendly mode, and integration."
"The modeler is useful for creating the flow. The way to access the data through their REST API is also valuable. This is what we're using right now."
"It has an open BPM"
"It is open-source. It supports microservice orchestration. This is what we are really interested in. We can customize our products depending on the use cases."
"I like everything about the entire BPM that comes with the BPM suite."
"The most valuable feature is the scheduling."
"The product is stable."
"Camunda is a scalable product."
"Overall, the solution has been very solid."
"One thing that could be improved would be for it to be deployed in a shorter time."
"AuraQuantic's price could be improved."
"More documentation and the ability to extract different reports about different relations in the objects I use will help."
"We'd like it more animated. It would be useful if we could integrate GIFs, for example."
"There should be a multi-tenant solution for the platform where it supports multiple organizations on one platform instead of having to spin up multiple clusters for each organization. There should be an easy way to integrate different departments into one platform without having to operate multiple platforms. The operations should be easier with the enterprise solution. It should not create more overhead for the operations people."
"I would also like a very easy to use form builder."
"When trying to design rule tables the solutions graphical user interface could improve, it could be more user friendly."
"There are a few things that I'm missing. For instance, the user interface creator, which I know other systems have, like Aurea or Lombardi, which are IBM solutions. The interface creator, including the data model creator or some module which would allow the users who are not programmers or business consultants and who are not technically skilled in database and Java programming, to create data models and user interfaces."
"Customization and tech stack could be up-to-date."
"Camunda Platform's customer support could be improved because their response is quite slow."
"We're trying to put the people from the business to do it. We are using APIs, and we have open APIs to define our APIs and the request-response that each call requires and sends. So, to base the mapping on that, there was nothing to help. I know that with some tools, such as Oracle tools, you can see the input and expected output. With drag and drop, you can take one property from the left and drag it to the right, and it does all the mapping itself, but that's not the case with Camunda. So, for me, this is something that can be improved."
"Would be helpful if there were additional out-of-the-box activities."
AuraQuantic is ranked 18th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 6 reviews while Camunda is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 66 reviews. AuraQuantic is rated 8.8, while Camunda is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of AuraQuantic writes "Responsive support, easy to use, and reliable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". AuraQuantic is most compared with Appian, Bizagi, Pega BPM and IBM BPM, whereas Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Pega BPM, Bizagi, IBM BPM and Appian. See our AuraQuantic vs. Camunda report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.