We performed a comparison between AuraQuantic and KiSSFLOW based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's a low-code application."
"AuraPortal is very user-friendly and flexible."
"AuraPortal has the best price for its process."
"AuraQuantic's most valuable features are the zero code, user-friendly mode, and integration."
"The best thing about Kissflow is its user-friendliness."
"The best thing about KiSSFLOW is that we can do virtual approvals."
"The best thing is the no-code part. Even a person without experience with the coding language can easily understand and build the processes."
"The most valuable feature is the performance."
"The most valuable feature is APIs. Its integrations are very flexible, allowing developers to connect multiple applications like DocuSign, Salesforce, OpenText, and SEB."
"I like the forms which help us to get information."
"Kissflow has reduced the bottleneck around getting approval for certain items in the company."
"I work in HR and am fond of automation. I like the tool's email automation and integration with Outlook."
"One thing that could be improved would be for it to be deployed in a shorter time."
"We'd like it more animated. It would be useful if we could integrate GIFs, for example."
"AuraQuantic's price could be improved."
"More documentation and the ability to extract different reports about different relations in the objects I use will help."
"They should increase their marketplace with existing tools so that connections are directly through connectors instead of API integrations."
"If Kissflow can help users to be able to organize the company manuals and information, the blogs, and everything into one resource, that would be awesome."
"Some of the tool's fields only accept certain types of text. The input fields are inflexible."
"There is room for improvement in terms of stability."
"KiSSFLOW needs to improve its integration."
"Sometimes some notifications don't appear on the mobile app."
"The UI, though is pretty friendly and easy to use, can be improved in some aspects."
"There is a lag in the delay between API calls."
AuraQuantic is ranked 18th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 6 reviews while KiSSFLOW is ranked 10th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 12 reviews. AuraQuantic is rated 8.8, while KiSSFLOW is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of AuraQuantic writes "Responsive support, easy to use, and reliable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of KiSSFLOW writes "The tool is intuitive to use and, through automation, has been a real time-saver". AuraQuantic is most compared with Appian, Camunda, Bizagi and IBM BPM, whereas KiSSFLOW is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Camunda, ServiceNow, Nintex Process Platform and OutSystems. See our AuraQuantic vs. KiSSFLOW report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
