We performed a comparison between AuraQuantic and webMethods Integration Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."It's a low-code application."
"AuraPortal has the best price for its process."
"AuraPortal is very user-friendly and flexible."
"AuraQuantic's most valuable features are the zero code, user-friendly mode, and integration."
"Currently, we're using this solution for the integration server which helps us to integrate with the mainframe."
"It's very flexible and a good platform to use."
"The stability is good."
"It's obvious that the heart of the product lies here. It's comprised of all aspects of ESB (Enterprise Gateway, Adapter, TN, Java) and BPM (task, rules engine)."
"From a user perspective, the feature which I like the most about Integration Server is its designer."
"The tool is very powerful and user-friendly."
"We needed a tool that was able to orchestrate and help us configure our APIs so that we could maintain and see the heartbeat, traffic, trends, etc."
"What I found most valuable in webMethods Integration Server is that it's a strong ESB. It also has strong API modules and portals."
"We'd like it more animated. It would be useful if we could integrate GIFs, for example."
"One thing that could be improved would be for it to be deployed in a shorter time."
"AuraQuantic's price could be improved."
"More documentation and the ability to extract different reports about different relations in the objects I use will help."
"In terms of improvement, it would be better if it adapted quicker to open standards. It took a while for API specification before the last version was available. The spec of version two was rather quick."
"Large file handling is pretty hard comparatively to other middleware tools."
"Rapid application development has to be considered, especially for UI, where user interference is crucial."
"The learning curve is a little steep at first."
"The price should be reduced to make it more affordable."
"In terms of scale, I would give it a four out of 10."
"When migration happens from the one release to an upgraded release from Software AG, many of the existing services are deprecated and developers have to put in effort testing and redeveloping some of the services. It would be better that upgrade releases took care to support the lower-level versions of webMethods."
"We got the product via a reseller, and the support from the reseller has been less than desirable."
More webMethods Integration Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
AuraQuantic is ranked 18th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 6 reviews while webMethods Integration Server is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 60 reviews. AuraQuantic is rated 8.8, while webMethods Integration Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AuraQuantic writes "Responsive support, easy to use, and reliable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Event-driven with lots of helpful formats, but minimal learning resources available". AuraQuantic is most compared with Appian, Camunda, Bizagi and IBM BPM, whereas webMethods Integration Server is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, webMethods.io Integration, Mule ESB, TIBCO BusinessWorks and Boomi AtomSphere Integration.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.