AuraQuantic vs webMethods Integration Server comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
AuraQuantic Logo
606 views|444 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Software AG Logo
3,421 views|2,391 comparisons
94% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AuraQuantic and webMethods Integration Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM).
To learn more, read our detailed Business Process Management (BPM) Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It's a low-code application.""AuraPortal has the best price for its process.""AuraPortal is very user-friendly and flexible.""AuraQuantic's most valuable features are the zero code, user-friendly mode, and integration."

More AuraQuantic Pros →

"Currently, we're using this solution for the integration server which helps us to integrate with the mainframe.""It's very flexible and a good platform to use.""The stability is good.""It's obvious that the heart of the product lies here. It's comprised of all aspects of ESB (Enterprise Gateway, Adapter, TN, Java) and BPM (task, rules engine).""From a user perspective, the feature which I like the most about Integration Server is its designer.""The tool is very powerful and user-friendly.""We needed a tool that was able to orchestrate and help us configure our APIs so that we could maintain and see the heartbeat, traffic, trends, etc.""What I found most valuable in webMethods Integration Server is that it's a strong ESB. It also has strong API modules and portals."

More webMethods Integration Server Pros →

Cons
"We'd like it more animated. It would be useful if we could integrate GIFs, for example.""One thing that could be improved would be for it to be deployed in a shorter time.""AuraQuantic's price could be improved.""More documentation and the ability to extract different reports about different relations in the objects I use will help."

More AuraQuantic Cons →

"In terms of improvement, it would be better if it adapted quicker to open standards. It took a while for API specification before the last version was available. The spec of version two was rather quick.""​Large file handling is pretty hard comparatively to other middleware tools.""Rapid application development has to be considered, especially for UI, where user interference is crucial.""The learning curve is a little steep at first.""The price should be reduced to make it more affordable.""In terms of scale, I would give it a four out of 10.""When migration happens from the one release to an upgraded release from Software AG, many of the existing services are deprecated and developers have to put in effort testing and redeveloping some of the services. It would be better that upgrade releases took care to support the lower-level versions of webMethods.""We got the product via a reseller, and the support from the reseller has been less than desirable."

More webMethods Integration Server Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The price could be better. It's quite expensive."
  • More AuraQuantic Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Initialy good pricing and good, if it comes to Enterprise license agreements."
  • "It is worth the cost."
  • "Always plan five years ahead and don’t jeopardize the quality of your project by dropping items from the bill of materials."
  • "Pricing has to be negotiated with the local Software AG representative. SAG can always prepare an appropriate pricing model for every client."
  • "Some of the licensing is "component-ized," which is confusing to new users/customers."
  • "It is expensive, but we reached a good agreement with the company. It is still a little bit expensive, but we got a better deal than the previous one."
  • "The pricing and licensing costs for webMethods are very high, which is the only reason that we might switch to another product."
  • "The vendor is flexible with respect to pricing."
  • More webMethods Integration Server Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:I do not handle the licensing. I do not have direct knowledge of the pricing. It's not within the scope of my work.
    Top Answer:We're just using images. We'd like it more animated. It would be useful if we could integrate GIFs, for example. There could be more adoptions. We'd like the option to connect this product with other… more »
    Top Answer:The synchronous and asynchronous messaging system the solution provides is very good.
    Top Answer:Other products have been using AI and cloud enhancements, but webMethods Integration Server is still lagging in that key area. It's very good as a standalone integration server, but it has to come up… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    606
    Comparisons
    444
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    405
    Rating
    10.0
    Views
    3,421
    Comparisons
    2,391
    Reviews
    21
    Average Words per Review
    668
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    AuraQuantic is a digital platform designed for business users to easily and rapidly build unlimited processes and applications to automate end-to-end operations, reducing costs and optimizing productivity.

    AuraQuantic is a no-code platform for building the enterprise solutions that drive Digital Transformation.

    Interface

    Delight users with attractive interfaces across multiple devices and deliver the best user experience. Respond immediately to their ever-changing needs with the agility provided by the platform and its no-code changes on the fly.

    Logic

    This is the most powerful part of any application. This is why AuraQuantic offers a long list of built-in, no-code functionalities.

    Data

    To manage application and process data models, AuraQuantic provides a visual data model designer and supports importing data schemas.

    Application Governance

    Access rights management (to apps and app development)Application metadata collection, Application performance monitoring, Application works dashboard, Custom ‘guardrails’ for practitioners/developersRole-based access control to data and services for app dev, Multiple practitioners/developers for a single app and across the platform.


    Business Analytics

    Digital Decisioning features aim to inform and automate operational decisions. These decisions continue to increase in amount and complexity due to growing customer demands. Business decision automation is a must to keep up with ever-changing customer needs.

    Thanks to business activity data collection, using custom applications built with AuraQuantic, the organization is empowered to carry out accurate analysis and act smart by leveraging business insights.

    Connectivity

    API REST, API SOAP, API DLL
    Exposing APIs (process/application logic and decision systems)
    Connector builder
    REST and SOAP web services connector
    External database connectors (Adapters Servers, scripts and stored procedures execution)
    .Net Assembly connector Connectors with Artificial Intelligence services (AI)
    Robotic Process Automation (RPA) service connectors
    More built-in connectors (50+)
    Microsoft Office 365, Google Suite, SAP…

    webMethods Integration Server is widely considered to be the best integration server available in the marketplace today. The solution can help users integrate everything and anything.

    webMethods Integration Server allows organizations to display and integrate existing and new business activities. The solution offers components that help users create, test, and install new services. webMethods Integration Server can automate, organize, and construct various gathered services and traditional legacy systems into productive value-added processes. webMethods Integration Server works as a secure platform for distributing and running services. The solution obtains and translates user requests, recognizes and records the requested service, translates and moves the data in the necessary format, receives the information back, and returns the information to the user in the appropriate original format. webMethods is the primary solution used by enterprise organizations for integrating functional coordination with application servers, custom applications, and databases. webMethods makes it easy for enterprise organizations to share electronic documents seamlessly.

    Users have several options to audit webMethods Integration Server processes using some of the component metrics below:

    • Adapters: Using the SOA extension for webMethods, users can easily monitor the performance of every adapter users have deployed. Available metrics include Adapter Services, Adapter Connection Pools, and Adapter Notifications nodes.

    • Business Processes: A business process is a process that uses a specific set of rules to perform tasks in a prescribed order. Many business processes depend on the successful integration of numerous systems, involving many people in varying roles. With the SOA extension for webMethods, users can easily monitor that workflow, ensuring that processes are being performed as defined.

    • Java Services: This includes services created in Java or in languages coordinated with Java.

    • WebServices: This includes services regarding webserver endpoints and performance.

    • XSLT Services: This service will allow users to transform XML data into other formats and includes the transformation to other services.

    • Thread Pools: This metric uses threads to conduct services, gather documents from the webMethods Broker, and initiate triggers. Documents can be published locally on the server or to the broker that will send the document out. A JMS trigger receives inbound messages and then processes those messages accordingly.

    Reviews from Real Users:

    “There are a few things about this product that we definitely like. It is very robust. If you build it nicely, you can't go wrong with it. It's rock solid. The development is very fast. If you know what you're doing, you can develop something very easy and very fast.” - Rohit S., Integration Lead at a wellness & fitness company

    “One of the most important features is that it gives you the possibility to do low-level integration. We can meet any requirements through customizations, transformations, or the logic that needs to be put in. When clients come to me with any problem, in about 99% of cases, I say, "Yes, it is feasible to do through webMethods." It has reached such a level of flexibility and maturity. Most of the things are available out of the box, and even if something is not available out of the box, we can customize it and deliver it for a client's requirements.” - Sushant D., IT specialist at Accenture

    Sample Customers
    Nissan, RSA Chile, New Millennia Group Plc (UK), TOYOTA, ArcelorMittal Brasil, KPN, Farmacia Luis Corbi, Farmacia del Paseo, Frutas Bean, IncAE Business School, BDO Argentina, Refinery of the Pacific, Balfego Grup, Fundacion Seneca, Technological Institute Maranosa, Coprusa Group, Constructec, University of Deusto, Tenco Shopping Centers, Spanish Railways Foundation, Arbora & Ausonia.
    Fujitsu, Coca Cola, ING, Credit Suisse, Electrolux, GTA, CosmosDirekt
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company22%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company28%
    Manufacturing Company18%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Retailer7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business100%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business35%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise47%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise70%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise70%
    Buyer's Guide
    Business Process Management (BPM)
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM). Updated: March 2024.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    AuraQuantic is ranked 18th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 6 reviews while webMethods Integration Server is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 60 reviews. AuraQuantic is rated 8.8, while webMethods Integration Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AuraQuantic writes "Responsive support, easy to use, and reliable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Event-driven with lots of helpful formats, but minimal learning resources available". AuraQuantic is most compared with Appian, Camunda, Bizagi and IBM BPM, whereas webMethods Integration Server is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, webMethods.io Integration, Mule ESB, TIBCO BusinessWorks and Boomi AtomSphere Integration.

    We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.