We performed a comparison between AuraQuantic and Bonita based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."AuraPortal is very user-friendly and flexible."
"AuraPortal has the best price for its process."
"It's a low-code application."
"AuraQuantic's most valuable features are the zero code, user-friendly mode, and integration."
"The most valuable features of Bonita are the connectors, detailed documentation, and web applications. The documentation was useful because it is how I learned how to use it."
"Development of forms and flows."
"The solution is stable. Even the older versions are stable."
"I find process management and user interface designing the most valuable features."
"Flexible and drag-and-drop type of UI is very valuable. The integrations are also very good. You can build workflows very quickly, which is my favorite activity. By using the GUI, you can build the entire mechanism, notifications, and all this kind of stuff."
"I really enjoy using the workflow management."
"Bonita is user-friendly."
"Bonita is simple and lightweight and is flexible to integrate with third-party systems. The UI is now flexible, whereas it was previously rigid. Any technology can be used as a frontend, including ReactJS, Angular, and others."
"More documentation and the ability to extract different reports about different relations in the objects I use will help."
"One thing that could be improved would be for it to be deployed in a shorter time."
"We'd like it more animated. It would be useful if we could integrate GIFs, for example."
"AuraQuantic's price could be improved."
"There is a need for more components in the library and additional customization options for these components."
"There is a considerable learning curve."
"I have run into a lot of problems because there is not enough documentation."
"The interface is advanced and quite good, but it could improve."
"I would like to improve the product's load balancing."
"We are struggling a bit with integrations."
"Installation could be made easier."
"The dashboard has limited features."
AuraQuantic is ranked 18th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 6 reviews while Bonita is ranked 11th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 27 reviews. AuraQuantic is rated 8.8, while Bonita is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of AuraQuantic writes "Responsive support, easy to use, and reliable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Bonita writes "A simple and lightweight college course automation system with third-party integrations". AuraQuantic is most compared with Appian, Camunda, Bizagi and IBM BPM, whereas Bonita is most compared with Camunda, Bizagi, IBM BPM, Apache Airflow and ProcessMaker. See our AuraQuantic vs. Bonita report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.