We performed a comparison between AuraQuantic and OpenText Documentum based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."It's a low-code application."
"AuraPortal is very user-friendly and flexible."
"AuraQuantic's most valuable features are the zero code, user-friendly mode, and integration."
"AuraPortal has the best price for its process."
"I appreciate Documentum's scalability, allowing for vast volumes of content storage."
"Documentum is a highly scalable document management solution because it's built on a solid platform."
"The most valuable feature of OpenText Documentum is the versioning."
"OpenText Documentum's composition is good. It is convenient and straight out of the box."
"OpenText Documentum has improved availability and performance in our organization."
"It stands out for its impressive records management capabilities and the ability to handle an extensive volume of documents, even reaching into the billions."
"The tool's most valuable feature is ACL, which helps to control the user groups that access the documents."
"The product is tamper-proof and enables us to return to the document source, which is helpful in legal issues."
"We'd like it more animated. It would be useful if we could integrate GIFs, for example."
"More documentation and the ability to extract different reports about different relations in the objects I use will help."
"One thing that could be improved would be for it to be deployed in a shorter time."
"AuraQuantic's price could be improved."
"OpenText Documentum needs to improve its support."
"It should provide more tools to help clients upgrade solutions based on Webtop."
"OpenText Documentum is moving to the cloud, and I am concerned about the security aspect of it."
"The vertical application could be improved."
"The main issue is the software's performance when storing around 10 million or more documents. It becomes slow and needs improvement. Perhaps it's a cloud-related issue, but it needs to be addressed. It could be due to our S3 bucket or something else. Nevertheless, this is a significant challenge we're facing."
"The user interface can be a bit more intuitive."
"OpenText Documentum's user interface could be improved a little bit."
"An area that needs to improve is how to reduce storage space on the AWS site."
AuraQuantic is ranked 18th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 6 reviews while OpenText Documentum is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Content Management with 26 reviews. AuraQuantic is rated 8.8, while OpenText Documentum is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of AuraQuantic writes "Responsive support, easy to use, and reliable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Documentum writes "Saves time and increases an organization's productivity". AuraQuantic is most compared with Appian, Camunda, Bizagi and IBM BPM, whereas OpenText Documentum is most compared with OpenText Extended ECM, SharePoint, IBM FileNet, Hyland OnBase and Alfresco.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.