We performed a comparison between AuraQuantic and Nintex Process Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."AuraPortal is very user-friendly and flexible."
"AuraPortal has the best price for its process."
"AuraQuantic's most valuable features are the zero code, user-friendly mode, and integration."
"It's a low-code application."
"The Vizio-style designer that runs in the browser is, to me, by far the most valuable feature of the solution. It means that the customer doesn’t have to install any client tools to create powerful workflows."
"The solution has helped us to automate our business processes, our approval systems, and automation for quickly developing on SharePoint on-prem and SharePoint online."
"It saves time as tasks are automated."
"This solution is very easy to use and customize, using almost zero coding. It's built on SharePoint which many companies in our country have experience with. This made it easy to adapt the application in our environment."
"The solution offers very good integration capabilities. We've never had issues integrating it without solutions."
"It can scale well."
"It is very easy to create and deploy. I am very happy with how user-friendly Nintex Workflow is."
"I find it useful to utilize LDAP query action to find out the status of a particular user."
"We'd like it more animated. It would be useful if we could integrate GIFs, for example."
"One thing that could be improved would be for it to be deployed in a shorter time."
"AuraQuantic's price could be improved."
"More documentation and the ability to extract different reports about different relations in the objects I use will help."
"The tool lacks to offer support for the Arabic language, and it needs consideration."
"Heavy, cumbersome and inflexible."
"Currently, copying workflow actions from one workflow to another is not possible. Also, the Office 365 solution is not as mature as on-premise."
"The solution does not integrate with many platforms."
"The solution needs more RPA and AI features."
"The interface could be better and more language support is needed in the development environment or in the solutions platform in general."
"K2's support for DevOp team corporations is weak."
"The product’s support for the mobile platform and its ability to handle artificial loads could be better."
AuraQuantic is ranked 18th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 6 reviews while Nintex Process Platform is ranked 9th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 21 reviews. AuraQuantic is rated 8.8, while Nintex Process Platform is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AuraQuantic writes "Responsive support, easy to use, and reliable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nintex Process Platform writes "Offers good integration capabilities and easy to learn and good stability". AuraQuantic is most compared with Appian, Camunda, Bizagi and IBM BPM, whereas Nintex Process Platform is most compared with Camunda, IBM BPM, Appian, Pega BPM and SAP Signavio Process Manager. See our AuraQuantic vs. Nintex Process Platform report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.