Aurea CX Messenger vs Avada Software Infrared360

Aurea CX Messenger is ranked 3rd in Business Activity Monitoring with 3 reviews vs Avada Software Infrared360 which is ranked 2nd in Business Activity Monitoring with 6 reviews. The top reviewer of Aurea CX Messenger writes "User-friendly tool which allows for a seamless approach to performing hotfixes". The top reviewer of Avada Software Infrared360 writes "It has a small footprint on our system. They're good at following up with their customers". Aurea CX Messenger is most compared with Mule ESB, RabbitMQ and ActiveMQ. Avada Software Infrared360 is most compared with IBM MQ, Oracle Enterprise Manager and Dynatrace. See our Aurea CX Messenger vs Avada Software Infrared360 report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
+Add products to compare
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Aurea CX Messenger vs Avada Software Infrared360 and others in Business Activity Monitoring.
288,186 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing Aurea CX Messenger vs Avada Software Infrared360

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
SDM: User-friendly tool which allows for a seamless approach to performing hotfixes, if required.ESB: Provides all kind of possibilities to resolve business needs. A lot of ready to use services plus custom Java services. I used a lot of them all.

Read more »

It allows non-technical users to inspect their individual components within the total infrastructure without disturbing other components and without bothering the technical teams.We have easily created use case testing harnesses for specific flows that incorporate various message types.It's what we use for monitoring our MQ system, so the features that they provide are just really, really good.The administration piece makes it very easy to do MQ administration. It gives us a lot more flexibility and capabilities.Monitoring that ties into our incident management system

Read more »

Cons
It should include/add more services with the product as per market demand. It should include custom Java services developed by any organization or provide a platform where users/developers can share ideas/custom services, etc.You should not hurry with upgrades without testing the whole product completely.

Read more »

The user interface could be sexier and more ergonomic. The competing products have similar problems.We are still working with the FTE/MFT subscription monitoring and reporting functionality. That is an area in which we would like to see further development taking place.One area where they could improve is with their documentation. Some sections are not up to date with new release information and providing additional samples in some areas would be very helpful.Some of the graphics in the interface could be improved. It's pretty basic. Some interfaces are not up to what you're used to seeing on other, more Windows-like tools.The UI can be cumbersome - but we are still using the Viper interface and we have not had the time to check out the Alloy interface which is supposed to be much improved.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
You pay nothing for licensing, because the commercial model is a subscription. Other environments, such as QA and Development, are included in the subscriptionMuch better than Oracle SOA Suite.

Read more »

Avada Software's licensing metric is very good because the license fees are based on the number of connections (which have not increased for us very much over the years) rather than the CPU processing power (which increases significantly whenever our hardware is upgraded) or the number of users (which has increased for us a lot since our original purchase).Our internal budget calculation model incorporates the pricing per endpoint for any new projects. However, as our footprint for distributed queue managers shrinks as part of our shared middleware hub deployment, the initial licensing and support costs have been reduced over the last five years.Because the licensing is at the QMGR level, you need to have at least a small cushion of licenses for occasional enterprise needs.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Activity Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
288,186 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING
Views
3,847
Comparisons
2,218
Reviews
3
Followers
345
Avg. Rating
9.3
Views
5,050
Comparisons
1,210
Reviews
6
Followers
1,964
Avg. Rating
9.0
Top Comparisons
Top Comparisons
Compared 22% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
See more Aurea CX Messenger competitors »
See more Avada Software Infrared360 competitors »
Also Known As
Also Known AsCX Messenger Enterprise, Aurea Sonic ESB, Aurea Sonic, Aurea Sonic MQInfrared360
Website/Video
Website/VideoAurea
Avada Software
Overview
Overview

CX Messenger lets your technology keep pace with your business. Aurea’s industry leading Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) lets you adapt and change your infrastructure with plug-and-play speed and ease.

Avada Software specializes in Enterprise Middleware solutions. Founded by some pioneers in SOA, MQ and J2EE technology, Avada’s Flagship product, Infrared360, is a holistic & innovative private cloud enabled portal providing self-service administration, monitoring, load testing, auditing & statistical reporting for Enterprise Middleware including IBM’s middleware stack of MQ, IIB (message broker), WAS, and Datapower, as well as other applications servers such as  JBoss, TC Server, Weblogic, and other messaging technologies such as Tibco EMS and Kafka*.

Accessed via any web browser on any device, Infrared360 is a single web application, yet scales to 2500+ endpoints without deploying anything (no agents, no scripts) to those endpoints.

Using trusted ‘spaces’ and delegated visibility and control, the portal uniquely provides different business units or even different application users virtual ‘spaces’ in which to work.  Within those spaces are only the objects and resources the user has been granted visibility.  Role policy dictates permissions on those resources.

It is the ONLY Enterprise Messaging Solution with a built in SOA engine that lets you leverage internal and external services for managing and correcting problems within your middleware messaging environment.                 

  *Kafka coming soon 

OFFER
Learn more about Aurea CX Messenger
Learn more about Avada Software Infrared360
Sample Customers
Sample CustomersHeathrow, HomeServe, Paypal, Freedom MortgageUSBank, Southwest Airlines, Visiting Nurse Services of New York, Aon Hewitt, Parker Hannifin, Cantonal Bank of Zurich (ZKB), Hagemeyer NA, and many others
Top Industries
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm
88%
Government
13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Transportation Company
24%
Financial Services Firm
23%
Government
9%
Insurance Company
8%
Company Size
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business
20%
Midsize Enterprise
30%
Large Enterprise
50%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
23%
Midsize Enterprise
18%
Large Enterprise
60%
Find out what your peers are saying about Aurea CX Messenger vs Avada Software Infrared360 and others in Business Activity Monitoring.
Download now
288,186 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Business Activity Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email