Compare Aurea CX Messenger vs. Fiorano ESB

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Aurea CX Messenger Logo
1,673 views|791 comparisons
Fiorano ESB Logo
836 views|490 comparisons
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, MuleSoft, Software AG and others in ESB. Updated: October 2020.
442,986 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ESB solutions are best for your needs.
442,986 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The solution offers excellent stability.
Top Answer: The licensing costs on a yearly basis are around $200,000. There are no additional costs besides the licensing fees. For example, you do not have to pay extra for technical support, etc.
Top Answer: The solution needs to improve support for new, more recent protocols on the API.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
11th
out of 24 in ESB
Views
1,673
Comparisons
791
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
495
Avg. Rating
8.0
13th
out of 24 in ESB
Views
836
Comparisons
490
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Compared 43% of the time.
Compared 24% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 35% of the time.
Compared 22% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Also Known As
CX Messenger Enterprise, Aurea Sonic ESB, Aurea Sonic, Aurea Sonic MQ
Learn
Aurea
Fiorano
Overview

CX Messenger lets your technology keep pace with your business. Aurea’s industry leading Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) lets you adapt and change your infrastructure with plug-and-play speed and ease.

The Fiorano ESB implements a brokered, peer-to-peer (often referred to as super peer) system architecture, which combines the management benefits of centralized hub-and-spoke systems with the performance benefits of fully distributed peer-to-peer systems, while avoiding the particular disadvantages of both of these individual approaches.
Offer
Learn more about Aurea CX Messenger
Learn more about Fiorano ESB
Sample Customers
Heathrow, HomeServe, Paypal, Freedom MortgagePolaris Transport, Harris Exelis, Aboitiz Power, Dyckerhoff AG, Gamma-Dynacare, DHL, Bajaj Finserv, Ecole hételire de Lausanne, Northern California Power Agency, Federal Bank, Commercial Bank of Africa, EasyPay, SSP, General American Corporation, Forex, Beijing Shubei Software Technology, City of Canton, Kent County Council, SJS District, County of Tulare, US Coast Guard, ZUNYI, Fraikin, Nilkamal, Posco, Toyota, UB Group
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company36%
International Affairs Institute11%
Retailer8%
K 12 Educational Company Or School8%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, MuleSoft, Software AG and others in ESB. Updated: October 2020.
442,986 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Aurea CX Messenger is ranked 11th in ESB with 1 review while Fiorano ESB is ranked 13th in ESB. Aurea CX Messenger is rated 8.0, while Fiorano ESB is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Aurea CX Messenger writes "Excellent stability, capable of scaling, and good at supporting security particulars". On the other hand, Aurea CX Messenger is most compared with Mule ESB, ActiveMQ, VMware RabbitMQ, IBM MQ and TIBCO Enterprise Message Service, whereas Fiorano ESB is most compared with Mule ESB, WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, IBM Integration Bus and Oracle Service Bus.

See our list of best ESB vendors.

We monitor all ESB reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.