Compare Aurea CX Messenger vs. IBM Integration Bus

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Aurea CX Messenger? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, MuleSoft, Software AG and others in ESB. Updated: October 2020.
442,194 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The solution offers excellent stability."

More Aurea CX Messenger Pros »

"It is very straightforward. It is very user-friendly integration.""IBM Integration Bus has a complete set of tools that are implemented between rules when it comes to run time, but it's not easy to understand.""My favorite feature is the XML-based DFDL mapping, which is a tool that allows you to graphically map legacy data formats to modern data formats.""From a performance point of view, it's very good and it doesn't need very much in terms of CPU resources.""This solution is very reliable and it is easy to learn.""The solution's features are all quite useful. We use all of them.""The integration with other tools is excellent. It integrates well with batch issues.""It has the ability to be deployed without rewriting the code."

More IBM Integration Bus Pros »

Cons
"The solution needs to improve support for new, more recent protocols on the API."

More Aurea CX Messenger Cons »

"To scale virtically, is difficult.""I would like to see more metered rest and API support. IBM is already working on it on Version 11, but it still needs improvement.""This solution would benefit from improvements to the configuration interface.""This product uses the PVU (Processor Value Unit) license model from IBM, and it is something that should be improved.""I would like to be able to run and install this solution on different platforms.""The user interface could be improved in a future release.""IBM could improve its connectivity.""I would like for them to make the training much easier."

More IBM Integration Bus Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"Our licensing is based on a five-year contract, and as far as I know, there are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fee.""The price of this product could be lower."

More IBM Integration Bus Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ESB solutions are best for your needs.
442,194 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The solution offers excellent stability.
Top Answer: The licensing costs on a yearly basis are around $200,000. There are no additional costs besides the licensing fees. For example, you do not have to pay extra for technical support, etc.
Top Answer: The solution needs to improve support for new, more recent protocols on the API.
Top Answer: It has the ability to be deployed without rewriting the code.
Top Answer: I don't have any information about licensing or costs. It's not something that I am in charge of.
Top Answer: I would like for them to make the training much easier. Once you work with a sphere of people that can integrate the solution, then it's stable. But just to educate people, it's not that easy to do… more »
Ranking
11th
out of 24 in ESB
Views
1,673
Comparisons
791
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
495
Avg. Rating
8.0
1st
out of 24 in ESB
Views
14,866
Comparisons
9,615
Reviews
14
Average Words per Review
555
Avg. Rating
8.2
Popular Comparisons
Compared 43% of the time.
Compared 24% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 40% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Also Known As
CX Messenger Enterprise, Aurea Sonic ESB, Aurea Sonic, Aurea Sonic MQIBM WebSphere ESB
Learn
Aurea
IBM
Overview

CX Messenger lets your technology keep pace with your business. Aurea’s industry leading Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) lets you adapt and change your infrastructure with plug-and-play speed and ease.

IBM Integration Bus is an enterprise integration engine that offers a fast, simple way for systems and applications to communicate with each other. As a result, it can help you achieve business value, reduce IT complexity and save money.
Offer
Learn more about Aurea CX Messenger
Learn more about IBM Integration Bus
Sample Customers
Heathrow, HomeServe, Paypal, Freedom MortgageSalesbox, €sterreichische Bundesbahnen (€BB), Road Buddy, Swiss Federal Railways, Electricity Supply Board, The Hartree Centre, ESB Networks
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company36%
International Affairs Institute11%
Retailer8%
K 12 Educational Company Or School8%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm47%
Computer Software Company16%
Comms Service Provider11%
Government5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company44%
Comms Service Provider14%
Government6%
Financial Services Firm5%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business21%
Midsize Enterprise7%
Large Enterprise71%
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, MuleSoft, Software AG and others in ESB. Updated: October 2020.
442,194 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Aurea CX Messenger is ranked 11th in ESB with 1 review while IBM Integration Bus is ranked 1st in ESB with 17 reviews. Aurea CX Messenger is rated 8.0, while IBM Integration Bus is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Aurea CX Messenger writes "Excellent stability, capable of scaling, and good at supporting security particulars". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Integration Bus writes "A GUI that greatly simplifies data transformation and application developmet, but it is difficult to configure". Aurea CX Messenger is most compared with Mule ESB, ActiveMQ, VMware RabbitMQ, IBM MQ and TIBCO Enterprise Message Service, whereas IBM Integration Bus is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM WebSphere Message Broker, Red Hat Fuse, Oracle Service Bus and IBM DataPower Gateway.

See our list of best ESB vendors.

We monitor all ESB reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.