We performed a comparison between Aurea CX Messenger and IBM Integration Bus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, MuleSoft, Software AG and others in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)."SDM: User-friendly tool which allows for a seamless approach to performing hotfixes, if required."
"The solution is highly scalable, this is very important for us. It can handle a lot of messages."
"The solution offers excellent stability."
"ESB: Provides all kind of possibilities to resolve business needs. A lot of ready to use services plus custom Java services. I used a lot of them all."
"The Messenger Broker is a really good feature."
"The features that I have found most valuable are that it is very easy to develop. Most of it is graphical, but we also have the option to add any custom call that you need."
"One of the most valuable features is how seamless and easy to use this solution is. This is a fantastic solution and a very measured product."
"Easy to understand documentation with a huge list of examples and tutorials."
"I use the integration of Kafka and the message flow, which is really good. It is also good for moving any file from one location to another. Using IBM Integration Bus in the data stage is pretty simple. You can see the preview and other things. The MQ server integrated with IBM Integration Bus is really great. I don't have to do a lot of configuration from that side. It is really good."
"The integration with other tools is excellent. It integrates well with batch issues."
"The multi-approach and the multi-capabilities are valuable."
"IBM Integration Bus' most valuable features are its performance, fast and easy development, and easy support."
"I found all features valuable. There are a lot of connectors."
"The most valuable feature is that it is clear and easy to learn."
"It should include/add more services with the product as per market demand. It should include custom Java services developed by any organization or provide a platform where users/developers can share ideas/custom services, etc."
"Aurea CX Messenger could improve by making better use of the new APIs"
"The improvement is that it should be on the cloud and use web services."
"I don't know if the last version has the cloud option, but maybe that could be good. That could be something that is included."
"You should not hurry with upgrades without testing the whole product completely."
"The solution needs to improve support for new, more recent protocols on the API."
"The memory footprint should be minimized."
"The price could be better. It would also be better if they simplified the code."
"Storage capacity of the product should be addressed."
"I can't say that there is any improvement I’m looking for. I’m new and haven’t connected with all features. For all drawbacks that were in the old version, I think they have been solved. The scalability needs improvement."
"We decided to move away from IBM Integration Bus for IT technical refreshments."
"This product uses the PVU (Processor Value Unit) license model from IBM, and it is something that should be improved."
"The solution needs instruction or guidance."
"The tracing and debugging features are not up to date with more modern technology available."
Aurea CX Messenger is ranked 12th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 7 reviews while IBM Integration Bus is ranked 1st in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 63 reviews. Aurea CX Messenger is rated 9.0, while IBM Integration Bus is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Aurea CX Messenger writes "Lightweight and efficient solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Integration Bus writes "Scalable solution with efficient integration features". Aurea CX Messenger is most compared with Mule ESB, TIBCO Enterprise Message Service and WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, whereas IBM Integration Bus is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM WebSphere Message Broker, Oracle Service Bus, webMethods Integration Server and IBM DataPower Gateway.
See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.