Compare Aurea CX Messenger vs. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager for SOA Platform

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which SOA Governance solutions are best for your needs.
442,764 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The solution offers excellent stability.
Top Answer: The licensing costs on a yearly basis are around $200,000. There are no additional costs besides the licensing fees. For example, you do not have to pay extra for technical support, etc.
Top Answer: The solution needs to improve support for new, more recent protocols on the API.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
3rd
out of 15 in SOA Governance
Views
1,673
Comparisons
791
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
495
Avg. Rating
8.0
12th
out of 15 in SOA Governance
Views
34
Comparisons
14
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Compared 43% of the time.
Compared 24% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Also Known As
CX Messenger Enterprise, Aurea Sonic ESB, Aurea Sonic, Aurea Sonic MQTivoli Composite Application Manager for SOA Platform
Learn
Aurea
IBM
Overview

CX Messenger lets your technology keep pace with your business. Aurea’s industry leading Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) lets you adapt and change your infrastructure with plug-and-play speed and ease.

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager for SOA Platform V6.2 (Composite Application Manager for SOA Platform) delivers an integrated offering for SOA management across the services, application, and middleware layers. Composite Application Manager for SOA Platform V6.2 combines the strength of in-depth Web services management with the management of WebSphere Application Servers, WebSphere MQ, and WebSphere Message Broker systems to deliver the information required to help meet demanding service levels required of SOA-based applications. When problems arise at the services layer, a launch-in-context capability of the application and messaging management components of Composite Application Manager for SOA Platform V6.2 makes it easy to find the root cause. IBM Tivoli delivers the out-of-the-box management that can provide a quick time-to-value for IT operations, architects, and subject matter experts.
Offer
Learn more about Aurea CX Messenger
Learn more about IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager for SOA Platform
Sample Customers
Heathrow, HomeServe, Paypal, Freedom MortgageFoedus, PLANSEE Group, hns hardware netzwerke software GmbH, Revera, BearingPoint, Sandhata Technologies Ltd., Air Canada, CMBC
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company36%
International Affairs Institute11%
Retailer8%
K 12 Educational Company Or School8%
No Data Available
Aurea CX Messenger is ranked 3rd in SOA Governance with 1 review while IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager for SOA Platform is ranked 12th in SOA Governance. Aurea CX Messenger is rated 8.0, while IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager for SOA Platform is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Aurea CX Messenger writes "Excellent stability, capable of scaling, and good at supporting security particulars". On the other hand, Aurea CX Messenger is most compared with Mule ESB, ActiveMQ, VMware RabbitMQ, IBM MQ and TIBCO Enterprise Message Service, whereas IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager for SOA Platform is most compared with .

See our list of best SOA Governance vendors.

We monitor all SOA Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.