We performed a comparison between Aurea CX Messenger and Mule ESB based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, MuleSoft, Software AG and others in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)."The features that I have found most valuable are that it is very easy to develop. Most of it is graphical, but we also have the option to add any custom call that you need."
"SDM: User-friendly tool which allows for a seamless approach to performing hotfixes, if required."
"The Messenger Broker is a really good feature."
"The solution is highly scalable, this is very important for us. It can handle a lot of messages."
"ESB: Provides all kind of possibilities to resolve business needs. A lot of ready to use services plus custom Java services. I used a lot of them all."
"The solution offers excellent stability."
"The most valuable feature for Mule is the number of connectors that are available."
"I am impressed with the product's connectors and scalability."
"Mule ESB is a very easy-to-use and user-friendly solution."
"The cloud and integration abilities are most useful allowing us to use applications such as Salesforce and DataWeave."
"The setup is straightforward."
"I like that it's user-friendly. Compared to other ESBs, I find it easier to use. I like it better than other ESBs. I like the connectors, which make calling the APIs through the routers easier."
"What Mule provides out-of-box is a sufficient product."
"It was pretty fast to develop APIs on this platform, which is something I liked about it. So, the time to value was pretty good."
"Aurea CX Messenger could improve by making better use of the new APIs"
"You should not hurry with upgrades without testing the whole product completely."
"I don't know if the last version has the cloud option, but maybe that could be good. That could be something that is included."
"It should include/add more services with the product as per market demand. It should include custom Java services developed by any organization or provide a platform where users/developers can share ideas/custom services, etc."
"The improvement is that it should be on the cloud and use web services."
"The solution needs to improve support for new, more recent protocols on the API."
"Lacking some connectors that could be included."
"There are limitations with the subscription model that comes with the product."
"The initial setup is not easy."
"In order to meet the new trend of active metadata management, we need intelligent APIs that can retrieve new data designs and trigger actions over new findings without human intervention."
"Limitation on external subscribers to listen to the messages on the bus."
"It should have some amount of logging."
"We would like to have a built-in logging framework in which we can do auditing."
"Mule ESB is more into the latest REST APIs, not much into the SOAP web services. Developing is all about web services and not easy with Mule."
Aurea CX Messenger is ranked 12th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 7 reviews while Mule ESB is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 45 reviews. Aurea CX Messenger is rated 9.0, while Mule ESB is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Aurea CX Messenger writes "Lightweight and efficient solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mule ESB writes "Plenty of documentation, flexible, and reliable". Aurea CX Messenger is most compared with TIBCO Enterprise Message Service and WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, whereas Mule ESB is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, Oracle Service Bus, Oracle SOA Suite, webMethods Integration Server and Red Hat Fuse.
See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
