We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Aurea CX Messenger vs. Mule ESB

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Aurea CX Messenger Logo
914 views|525 comparisons
Mule ESB Logo
19,453 views|14,508 comparisons
Top Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Software AG, IBM, MuleSoft and others in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB). Updated: October 2021.
543,089 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The solution offers excellent stability."

More Aurea CX Messenger Pros »

"The connectivity the solution provides is excellent. There are often too many systems that we have to integrate and this helps with that.""Easy connectivity and easy integration.""The transformation and the data format are the features that I like the most.""The most valuable feature for Mule is the number of connectors that are available.""Everything runs in Java, which is a useful feature.""What Mule provides out-of-box is a sufficient product.""The cloud and integration abilities are most useful allowing us to use applications such as Salesforce and DataWeave.""The solution offers multiple deployment options."

More Mule ESB Pros »

Cons
"The solution needs to improve support for new, more recent protocols on the API."

More Aurea CX Messenger Cons »

"The solution isn't as stable as we'd like it to be. There are some ongoing issues and therefore Mule has to provide frequent patches. Mule's core IP should be more stable overall.""Lacking some connectors that could be included.""It's not easy to troubleshoot and we still can't make it work.""MuleSoft is not so strong in method-based integration, so they're not so functional in that regard.""There are some issues with both stability and scalability.""There are limitations with the subscription model that comes with the product.""In an upcoming release, I would like to see more additional concept for exception handling, batch processing, and increased integration with other application.""It would be great to see implementing security modules as a feature."

More Mule ESB Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"The licensing is yearly, and there are additional fees for services.""This product is cheaper than some offered by other vendors, although there is a problem because you have to pay for some third-party adapters."

More Mule ESB Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) solutions are best for your needs.
543,089 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: I was previously part of the Oracle SOA/OSB development team. In my current capacity I architected solutions using MuleSoft Anypoint Platform on cloud / on-premises and hybrid modes and on PCE/RTF on… more »
Top Answer: The solution offers multiple deployment options.
Top Answer: In respect of the UI or the interface, a concept such as that offered by Microgateway would be preferable. We basically use ESB for the gateways. Yet, sometimes when we make use of on-premises… more »
Ranking
Views
914
Comparisons
525
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
495
Rating
8.0
Views
19,453
Comparisons
14,508
Reviews
8
Average Words per Review
432
Rating
7.4
Comparisons
Also Known As
CX Messenger Enterprise, Aurea Sonic ESB, Aurea Sonic, Aurea Sonic MQ
Learn More
Aurea
Video Not Available
Overview

CX Messenger lets your technology keep pace with your business. Aurea’s industry leading Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) lets you adapt and change your infrastructure with plug-and-play speed and ease.

For companies looking to modernize and unlock the value of existing on-premises systems and applications, an enterprise service bus (ESB) architecture serves as a critical foundation layer for SOA. When deployed as an ESB, the Mule runtime engine of Anypoint Platform combines the power of data and application integration across legacy systems and SaaS applications, with a seamless path to the other capabilities of Anypoint Platform and the full power of API-led connectivity.
Offer
Learn more about Aurea CX Messenger
Learn more about Mule ESB
Sample Customers
Heathrow, HomeServe, Paypal, Freedom Mortgage
Ube, PacificComp, University of Witwatersrand, Justice Systems, Camelot
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company35%
Comms Service Provider11%
Manufacturing Company11%
Retailer6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company36%
Comms Service Provider15%
Financial Services Firm7%
Energy/Utilities Company7%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business38%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise51%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business25%
Midsize Enterprise9%
Large Enterprise66%
Find out what your peers are saying about Software AG, IBM, MuleSoft and others in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB). Updated: October 2021.
543,089 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Aurea CX Messenger is ranked 12th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 1 review while Mule ESB is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 8 reviews. Aurea CX Messenger is rated 8.0, while Mule ESB is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Aurea CX Messenger writes "Excellent stability, capable of scaling, and good at supporting security particulars". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mule ESB writes "Well performing and easy to use solution". Aurea CX Messenger is most compared with IBM MQ, Apache Kafka, ActiveMQ, VMware RabbitMQ and TIBCO Enterprise Message Service, whereas Mule ESB is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, webMethods Integration Server, Red Hat Fuse, TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus and Oracle Service Bus.

See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.