We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The solution offers excellent stability."
"The connectivity the solution provides is excellent. There are often too many systems that we have to integrate and this helps with that."
"Easy connectivity and easy integration."
"The transformation and the data format are the features that I like the most."
"The most valuable feature for Mule is the number of connectors that are available."
"Everything runs in Java, which is a useful feature."
"What Mule provides out-of-box is a sufficient product."
"The cloud and integration abilities are most useful allowing us to use applications such as Salesforce and DataWeave."
"The solution offers multiple deployment options."
"The solution needs to improve support for new, more recent protocols on the API."
"The solution isn't as stable as we'd like it to be. There are some ongoing issues and therefore Mule has to provide frequent patches. Mule's core IP should be more stable overall."
"Lacking some connectors that could be included."
"It's not easy to troubleshoot and we still can't make it work."
"MuleSoft is not so strong in method-based integration, so they're not so functional in that regard."
"There are some issues with both stability and scalability."
"There are limitations with the subscription model that comes with the product."
"In an upcoming release, I would like to see more additional concept for exception handling, batch processing, and increased integration with other application."
"It would be great to see implementing security modules as a feature."
"The licensing is yearly, and there are additional fees for services."
"This product is cheaper than some offered by other vendors, although there is a problem because you have to pay for some third-party adapters."
Earn 20 points
CX Messenger lets your technology keep pace with your business. Aurea’s industry leading Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) lets you adapt and change your infrastructure with plug-and-play speed and ease.
Aurea CX Messenger is ranked 12th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 1 review while Mule ESB is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 8 reviews. Aurea CX Messenger is rated 8.0, while Mule ESB is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Aurea CX Messenger writes "Excellent stability, capable of scaling, and good at supporting security particulars". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mule ESB writes "Well performing and easy to use solution". Aurea CX Messenger is most compared with IBM MQ, Apache Kafka, ActiveMQ, VMware RabbitMQ and TIBCO Enterprise Message Service, whereas Mule ESB is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, webMethods Integration Server, Red Hat Fuse, TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus and Oracle Service Bus.
See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.