Compare Aurea CX Messenger vs. Red Hat AMQ

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Aurea CX Messenger Logo
1,673 views|791 comparisons
Red Hat AMQ Logo
3,998 views|3,171 comparisons
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Apache, VMware and others in Message Queue (MQ) Software. Updated: October 2020.
442,194 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The solution offers excellent stability."

More Aurea CX Messenger Pros »

"My impression is that it is average in terms of scalability."

More Red Hat AMQ Pros »

Cons
"The solution needs to improve support for new, more recent protocols on the API."

More Aurea CX Messenger Cons »

"There are several areas in this solution that need improvement, including clustering multi-nodes and message ordering."

More Red Hat AMQ Cons »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions are best for your needs.
442,194 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The solution offers excellent stability.
Top Answer: The licensing costs on a yearly basis are around $200,000. There are no additional costs besides the licensing fees. For example, you do not have to pay extra for technical support, etc.
Top Answer: The solution needs to improve support for new, more recent protocols on the API.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
1,673
Comparisons
791
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
495
Avg. Rating
8.0
Views
3,998
Comparisons
3,171
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
812
Avg. Rating
4.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 43% of the time.
Compared 24% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 39% of the time.
Compared 23% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 3% of the time.
Also Known As
CX Messenger Enterprise, Aurea Sonic ESB, Aurea Sonic, Aurea Sonic MQRed Hat JBoss A-MQ, Red Hat JBoss AMQ
Learn
Aurea
Red Hat
Overview

CX Messenger lets your technology keep pace with your business. Aurea’s industry leading Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) lets you adapt and change your infrastructure with plug-and-play speed and ease.

To respond to business demands quickly and efficiently, you need a way to integrate the applications and data spread across your enterprise. Red Hat JBoss A-MQ—based on the Apache ActiveMQ open source project—is a flexible, high-performance messaging platform that delivers information reliably, enabling real-time integration and connecting the Internet of Things (IoT).

Offer
Learn more about Aurea CX Messenger
Learn more about Red Hat AMQ
Sample Customers
Heathrow, HomeServe, Paypal, Freedom MortgageE*TRADE, CERN, CenturyLink, AECOM, Sabre Holdings
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company36%
International Affairs Institute11%
Retailer8%
K 12 Educational Company Or School8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company53%
Comms Service Provider12%
Government6%
Financial Services Firm6%
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Apache, VMware and others in Message Queue (MQ) Software. Updated: October 2020.
442,194 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Aurea CX Messenger is ranked 9th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 1 review while Red Hat AMQ is ranked 8th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 1 review. Aurea CX Messenger is rated 8.0, while Red Hat AMQ is rated 4.0. The top reviewer of Aurea CX Messenger writes "Excellent stability, capable of scaling, and good at supporting security particulars". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat AMQ writes "Scalable to a point, but the product is not stable and technical support needs to be improved". Aurea CX Messenger is most compared with Mule ESB, ActiveMQ, VMware RabbitMQ, IBM MQ and TIBCO Enterprise Message Service, whereas Red Hat AMQ is most compared with Apache Kafka, ActiveMQ, IBM MQ, VMware RabbitMQ and Amazon MQ.

See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.

We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.