Compare Aurea CX Messenger vs. Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Apache, VMware and others in Message Queue (MQ) Software. Updated: October 2020.
443,152 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions are best for your needs.
443,152 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The solution offers excellent stability.
Top Answer: The licensing costs on a yearly basis are around $200,000. There are no additional costs besides the licensing fees. For example, you do not have to pay extra for technical support, etc.
Top Answer: The solution needs to improve support for new, more recent protocols on the API.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
1,673
Comparisons
791
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
495
Avg. Rating
8.0
Views
272
Comparisons
253
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Compared 43% of the time.
Compared 24% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Also Known As
CX Messenger Enterprise, Aurea Sonic ESB, Aurea Sonic, Aurea Sonic MQ
Learn
Aurea
Red Hat
Overview

CX Messenger lets your technology keep pace with your business. Aurea’s industry leading Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) lets you adapt and change your infrastructure with plug-and-play speed and ease.

To respond to business demands quickly and efficiently, you need a way to integrate the applications and data spread across your enterprise. Red Hat JBoss A-MQ—based on the Apache ActiveMQ open source project—is a flexible, high-performance messaging platform that delivers information reliably, enabling real-time integration and connecting the Internet of Things (IoT).

Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS extends the capabilities to our Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS) solution, Red Hat OpenShift, for messaging services in the cloud.

Offer
Learn more about Aurea CX Messenger
Learn more about Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS
Sample Customers
Heathrow, HomeServe, Paypal, Freedom MortgageE*TRADE, CERN, CenturyLink, AECOM, Sabre Holdings
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company36%
International Affairs Institute11%
Retailer8%
K 12 Educational Company Or School8%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Apache, VMware and others in Message Queue (MQ) Software. Updated: October 2020.
443,152 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Aurea CX Messenger is ranked 9th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 1 review while Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS is ranked 14th in Message Queue (MQ) Software. Aurea CX Messenger is rated 8.0, while Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Aurea CX Messenger writes "Excellent stability, capable of scaling, and good at supporting security particulars". On the other hand, Aurea CX Messenger is most compared with Mule ESB, ActiveMQ, VMware RabbitMQ, IBM MQ and TIBCO Enterprise Message Service, whereas Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS is most compared with Apache Kafka, IBM MQ, ActiveMQ and Amazon SQS.

See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.

We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.