Aurea CX Messenger vs Red Hat AMQ comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Aurea CX Messenger and Red Hat AMQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, IBM, Amazon and others in Message Queue (MQ) Software.
To learn more, read our detailed Message Queue (MQ) Software Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Radhey Rajput
MichaelSukachev
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution offers excellent stability.""The features that I have found most valuable are that it is very easy to develop. Most of it is graphical, but we also have the option to add any custom call that you need.""The solution is highly scalable, this is very important for us. It can handle a lot of messages.""ESB: Provides all kind of possibilities to resolve business needs. A lot of ready to use services plus custom Java services. I used a lot of them all.""SDM: User-friendly tool which allows for a seamless approach to performing hotfixes, if required.""The Messenger Broker is a really good feature."

More Aurea CX Messenger Pros →

"Red Hat AMQ's best feature is its reliability.""AMQ is highly scalable and performs well. It can process a large volume of messages in one second. AMQ and OpenShift are a good combination.""This product is well adopted on the OpenShift platform. For organizations like ours that use OpenShift for many of our products, this is a good feature.""The most valuable feature for us is the operator-based automation that is provided by Streams for infrastructure as well as user and topic management. This saves a lot of time and effort on our part to provide infrastructure. For example, the deployment of infrastructure is reduced from approximately a week to a day.""The most valuable feature is stability.""The solution is very lightweight, easy to configure, simple to manage, and robust since it launched.""My impression is that it is average in terms of scalability."

More Red Hat AMQ Pros →

Cons
"It should include/add more services with the product as per market demand. It should include custom Java services developed by any organization or provide a platform where users/developers can share ideas/custom services, etc.""You should not hurry with upgrades without testing the whole product completely.""The improvement is that it should be on the cloud and use web services.""Aurea CX Messenger could improve by making better use of the new APIs""The solution needs to improve support for new, more recent protocols on the API.""I don't know if the last version has the cloud option, but maybe that could be good. That could be something that is included."

More Aurea CX Messenger Cons →

"Red Hat AMQ's cost could be improved, and it could have better integration.""The turnaround of adopting new versions of underlying technologies sometimes is too slow.""There is improvement needed to keep the support libraries updated.""There are several areas in this solution that need improvement, including clustering multi-nodes and message ordering.""This product needs better visualization capabilities in general.""AMQ could be better integrated with Jira and patch management tools.""There are some aspects of the monitoring that could be improved on. There is a tool that is somewhat connected to Kafka called Service Registry. This is a product by Red Hat that I would like to see integrated more tightly."

More Red Hat AMQ Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Much better than Oracle SOA Suite."
  • "You pay nothing for licensing, because the commercial model is a subscription. Other environments, such as QA and Development, are included in the subscription"
  • "The pricing is not so high."
  • More Aurea CX Messenger Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "There is a subscription needed for this solution and there are support plans available."
  • "This is a very cost-effective solution and the pricing is much better than competitors."
  • "The solution is open-source."
  • "Red Hat AMQ's pricing could be improved."
  • More Red Hat AMQ Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions are best for your needs.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The Messenger Broker is a really good feature.
    Top Answer:The pricing is not so high. I will rate it a seven out of ten, where one is the lowest and ten is the highest. There are no additional fees to the standard license.
    Top Answer:The improvement is that it should be on the cloud and use web services because the earlier version is not using web service and cloud functionality. If Aurea could include these features in the future… more »
    Top Answer:AMQ is highly scalable and performs well. It can process a large volume of messages in one second. AMQ and OpenShift are a good combination.
    Top Answer:AMQ could be better integrated with Jira and patch management tools.
    Top Answer:We use AMQ's event-driven architecture to exchange messages, and I can connect the AMQ Broker through various integrations.
    Ranking
    Views
    447
    Comparisons
    124
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    456
    Rating
    9.0
    Views
    5,534
    Comparisons
    3,897
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    268
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    CX Messenger Enterprise, Aurea Sonic ESB, Aurea Sonic, Aurea Sonic MQ
    Red Hat JBoss A-MQ, Red Hat JBoss AMQ
    Learn More
    Aurea
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    CX Messenger lets your technology keep pace with your business. Aurea’s industry leading Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) lets you adapt and change your infrastructure with plug-and-play speed and ease.

    To respond to business demands quickly and efficiently, you need a way to integrate the applications and data spread across your enterprise. Red Hat JBoss A-MQ—based on the Apache ActiveMQ open source project—is a flexible, high-performance messaging platform that delivers information reliably, enabling real-time integration and connecting the Internet of Things (IoT).

    Sample Customers
    Heathrow, HomeServe, Paypal, Freedom Mortgage
    E*TRADE, CERN, CenturyLink, AECOM, Sabre Holdings
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Government6%
    Energy/Utilities Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm26%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Government10%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise71%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise62%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise50%
    Large Enterprise25%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise75%
    Buyer's Guide
    Message Queue (MQ) Software
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, IBM, Amazon and others in Message Queue (MQ) Software. Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Aurea CX Messenger is ranked 11th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 7 reviews while Red Hat AMQ is ranked 8th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 7 reviews. Aurea CX Messenger is rated 9.0, while Red Hat AMQ is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Aurea CX Messenger writes "Lightweight and efficient solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat AMQ writes "A stable, open-source technology, with a convenient deployment". Aurea CX Messenger is most compared with Mule ESB, TIBCO Enterprise Message Service and Apache Kafka, whereas Red Hat AMQ is most compared with Apache Kafka, ActiveMQ, IBM MQ, VMware RabbitMQ and IBM Event Streams.

    See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.

    We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.