Aurea CX Messenger vs StormMQ comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Aurea Logo
447 views|124 comparisons
StormMQ Logo
51 views|36 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Aurea CX Messenger and StormMQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, IBM, Amazon and others in Message Queue (MQ) Software.
To learn more, read our detailed Message Queue (MQ) Software Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Radhey Rajput
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Much better than Oracle SOA Suite."
  • "You pay nothing for licensing, because the commercial model is a subscription. Other environments, such as QA and Development, are included in the subscription"
  • "The pricing is not so high."
  • More Aurea CX Messenger Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions are best for your needs.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The Messenger Broker is a really good feature.
    Top Answer:The pricing is not so high. I will rate it a seven out of ten, where one is the lowest and ten is the highest. There are no additional fees to the standard license.
    Top Answer:The improvement is that it should be on the cloud and use web services because the earlier version is not using web service and cloud functionality. If Aurea could include these features in the future… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    447
    Comparisons
    124
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    456
    Rating
    9.0
    Views
    51
    Comparisons
    36
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    CX Messenger Enterprise, Aurea Sonic ESB, Aurea Sonic, Aurea Sonic MQ
    Learn More
    Aurea
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    CX Messenger lets your technology keep pace with your business. Aurea’s industry leading Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) lets you adapt and change your infrastructure with plug-and-play speed and ease.

    Every connection, every action, every permission requested. Logged and available for review for 365 days. PCI DSS compatible. The only MQ solution designed from scratch to be Multi‑Tenanted. 

    Sample Customers
    Heathrow, HomeServe, Paypal, Freedom Mortgage
    Smith Electric Vehicles
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Government6%
    Energy/Utilities Company6%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise71%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise62%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Message Queue (MQ) Software
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, IBM, Amazon and others in Message Queue (MQ) Software. Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Aurea CX Messenger is ranked 11th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 7 reviews while StormMQ is ranked 17th in Message Queue (MQ) Software. Aurea CX Messenger is rated 9.0, while StormMQ is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Aurea CX Messenger writes "Lightweight and efficient solution". On the other hand, Aurea CX Messenger is most compared with Mule ESB, TIBCO Enterprise Message Service and Apache Kafka, whereas StormMQ is most compared with .

    See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.

    We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.