Compare Aurea CX Messenger vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Aurea CX Messenger? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, MuleSoft, Software AG and others in ESB. Updated: October 2020.
441,478 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The solution offers excellent stability."

More Aurea CX Messenger Pros »

"The stability of this solution is excellent.""The most valuable features are the monitoring, ease of use, and easy to understand development GUI.""TIBCO has the platform in terms of speed and ease of use.""The solution is very stable.""The most valuable feature is that it is a service-oriented architecture, SOA-based."

More TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus Pros »

Cons
"The solution needs to improve support for new, more recent protocols on the API."

More Aurea CX Messenger Cons »

"In the configuration, where we need to customize, it takes more time that we expect it to, ideally.""Migration to cloud solutions or products should be made convenient, transparent, and easily understandable.""In the next release, there should be improvements made to the API manager.""If TIBCO could be able to sort the size of their base image in the Container edition, it would be really marvelous. Right now it's around 299 MB. We'd really want it to reduce to a few MBs.""Our version does not have cloud capabilities."

More TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"When it comes to cost, TIBCO is much more competitive than a product like Pega.""The licensing cost is a challenge for quite a few customers."

More TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ESB solutions are best for your needs.
441,478 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The solution offers excellent stability.
Top Answer: The licensing costs on a yearly basis are around $200,000. There are no additional costs besides the licensing fees. For example, you do not have to pay extra for technical support, etc.
Top Answer: The solution needs to improve support for new, more recent protocols on the API.
Top Answer: The solution is very stable.
Top Answer: We consult with TIBCO to understand the market and try to get the customer's different levels of pricing.
Top Answer: If TIBCO could be able to sort the size of their base image in the Container edition, it would be really marvelous. Right now it's around 299 MB. We'd really want it to reduce to a few MBs. TIBCO… more »
Ranking
11th
out of 24 in ESB
Views
1,673
Comparisons
791
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
495
Avg. Rating
8.0
4th
out of 24 in ESB
Views
2,947
Comparisons
2,069
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
648
Avg. Rating
9.2
Popular Comparisons
Compared 43% of the time.
Compared 25% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Also Known As
CX Messenger Enterprise, Aurea Sonic ESB, Aurea Sonic, Aurea Sonic MQActiveMatrix Service Bus
Learn
Aurea
TIBCO
Overview

CX Messenger lets your technology keep pace with your business. Aurea’s industry leading Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) lets you adapt and change your infrastructure with plug-and-play speed and ease.

TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus is a platform for developing, deploying, and managing applications that conform to a service-oriented architecture. TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus is a lightweight enterprise service bus that helps organizations bridge the mediation gap in their SOA infrastructure. It reduces complexity and increases flexibility and reuse by replacing hard-coded service dependencies with configuration, and can be used to onboard services from a third-party environment or a TIBCO-based infrastructure. TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus provides service mediation capabilities to the TIBCO ActiveMatrix SOA platform. Service mediation allows you to adapt to changing requirements for developing mediation flows.
Offer
Learn more about Aurea CX Messenger
Learn more about TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus
Sample Customers
Heathrow, HomeServe, Paypal, Freedom MortgageColonial Life, CTBC Bank, New World Mobility, QUALCOMM, Swisscom Mobile, T-Mobile USA, Tata Teleservices, Telecom Italia
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company40%
K 12 Educational Company Or School9%
Venture Capital & Private Equity Firm7%
Retailer7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company38%
Comms Service Provider26%
Financial Services Firm5%
Retailer4%
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, MuleSoft, Software AG and others in ESB. Updated: October 2020.
441,478 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Aurea CX Messenger is ranked 11th in ESB with 1 review while TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus is ranked 4th in ESB with 5 reviews. Aurea CX Messenger is rated 8.0, while TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of Aurea CX Messenger writes "Excellent stability, capable of scaling, and good at supporting security particulars". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus writes "Easy to use, performs well, and it's the best platform in terms of speed". Aurea CX Messenger is most compared with Mule ESB, ActiveMQ, VMware RabbitMQ, IBM MQ and TIBCO Enterprise Message Service, whereas TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM Integration Bus, Red Hat Fuse, Oracle Service Bus and IBM DataPower Gateway.

See our list of best ESB vendors.

We monitor all ESB reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.