Compare Aurea CX Messenger vs. webMethods Integration Server

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Aurea CX Messenger? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, MuleSoft, Software AG and others in ESB. Updated: October 2020.
441,850 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The solution offers excellent stability."

More Aurea CX Messenger Pros »

"It's obvious that the heart of the product lies here. It's comprised of all aspects of ESB (Enterprise Gateway, Adapter, TN, Java) and BPM (task, rules engine).""We can arrange data caching and look at the solid state. Also, the API gateway is a very good component that can handle relevant cachings and integrations, as well as and also load permitting.""A product with good API and EDI components.""All of the components are very independent but are tied together to give the business value.""The most valuable feature is stability.""The tool is very powerful and user-friendly."

More webMethods Integration Server Pros »

Cons
"The solution needs to improve support for new, more recent protocols on the API."

More Aurea CX Messenger Cons »

"t doesn't represent OOP very well, just a method and proprietary interface called IData.""We need more dashboards and reporting engines that can provide detailed information for management. In short, we need better analytics.""The interface needs some work. It is not very user-friendly.""The price should be reduced to make it more affordable.""Technical support is an area where they can improve.""I would like to have a dashboard where I can see all of the communication between components and the configuration."

More webMethods Integration Server Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"Some of the licensing is "component-ized," which is confusing to new users/customers.""It is expensive, but we reached a good agreement with the company. It is still a little bit expensive, but we got a better deal than the previous one.""The pricing and licensing costs for webMethods are very high, which is the only reason that we might switch to another product.""The vendor is flexible with respect to pricing.""This is an expensive product and we may replace it with something more reasonably priced."

More webMethods Integration Server Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ESB solutions are best for your needs.
441,850 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The solution offers excellent stability.
Top Answer: The licensing costs on a yearly basis are around $200,000. There are no additional costs besides the licensing fees. For example, you do not have to pay extra for technical support, etc.
Top Answer: The solution needs to improve support for new, more recent protocols on the API.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
11th
out of 24 in ESB
Views
1,673
Comparisons
791
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
495
Avg. Rating
8.0
3rd
out of 24 in ESB
Views
17,016
Comparisons
11,687
Reviews
7
Average Words per Review
417
Avg. Rating
8.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 43% of the time.
Compared 24% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Also Known As
CX Messenger Enterprise, Aurea Sonic ESB, Aurea Sonic, Aurea Sonic MQ
Learn
Aurea
Software AG
Overview

CX Messenger lets your technology keep pace with your business. Aurea’s industry leading Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) lets you adapt and change your infrastructure with plug-and-play speed and ease.

The award-winning webMethods Integration Server, our Enterprise Service Bus (ESB), is a complete enterprise application integration solution. It's standards-based so it "speaks" any technology. You can integrate any technology from any vendor: ERP systems, databases, mainframes and legacy apps. SaaS platforms, Web services, JMS messaging systems and packaged apps.

Offer
Learn more about Aurea CX Messenger
Learn more about webMethods Integration Server
Sample Customers
Heathrow, HomeServe, Paypal, Freedom MortgageFujitsu, Coca Cola, ING, Credit Suisse, Electrolux, GTA, CosmosDirekt
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company38%
International Affairs Institute12%
K 12 Educational Company Or School8%
Venture Capital & Private Equity Firm7%
REVIEWERS
Energy/Utilities Company15%
Insurance Company15%
Computer Software Company15%
Manufacturing Company15%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company44%
Comms Service Provider11%
Media Company6%
Retailer5%
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, MuleSoft, Software AG and others in ESB. Updated: October 2020.
441,850 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Aurea CX Messenger is ranked 11th in ESB with 1 review while webMethods Integration Server is ranked 3rd in ESB with 7 reviews. Aurea CX Messenger is rated 8.0, while webMethods Integration Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Aurea CX Messenger writes "Excellent stability, capable of scaling, and good at supporting security particulars". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Integration Server and Universal messaging create an efficient development phase, enhance agility". Aurea CX Messenger is most compared with Mule ESB, ActiveMQ, VMware RabbitMQ, IBM MQ and TIBCO Enterprise Message Service, whereas webMethods Integration Server is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM Integration Bus, Oracle Service Bus, SAP Process Orchestration and IBM WebSphere Message Broker.

See our list of best ESB vendors.

We monitor all ESB reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.