We performed a comparison between Aurea CX Messenger and Oracle Service Bus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, MuleSoft, Software AG and others in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)."The solution offers excellent stability."
"The solution is highly scalable, this is very important for us. It can handle a lot of messages."
"ESB: Provides all kind of possibilities to resolve business needs. A lot of ready to use services plus custom Java services. I used a lot of them all."
"The features that I have found most valuable are that it is very easy to develop. Most of it is graphical, but we also have the option to add any custom call that you need."
"SDM: User-friendly tool which allows for a seamless approach to performing hotfixes, if required."
"The Messenger Broker is a really good feature."
"Monitoring feature that allows tracking of the web's UI development."
"Service Bus is good at routing the transformation."
"The routing and aggregation are the most valuable features. It's split and join."
"Supports multiple protocol technologies and web services."
"What I found most valuable in Oracle Service Bus is its time to market. It's excellent."
"The communication between applications is already defined, which means that you don't have to redefine your service infrastructure at the lower level."
"We've been pleased with the level of technical support."
"The stability is consistently high, with only one notable issue encountered."
"I don't know if the last version has the cloud option, but maybe that could be good. That could be something that is included."
"It should include/add more services with the product as per market demand. It should include custom Java services developed by any organization or provide a platform where users/developers can share ideas/custom services, etc."
"You should not hurry with upgrades without testing the whole product completely."
"Aurea CX Messenger could improve by making better use of the new APIs"
"The improvement is that it should be on the cloud and use web services."
"The solution needs to improve support for new, more recent protocols on the API."
"There are issues, especially if you want to create some compensation in your service bin."
"Security needs to be more integrated."
"It needs to support more adapters, because the integration points keep changing and new things keep coming up. It also needs to be more scalable."
"It's very complex and hard to learn. There's a steep learning curve."
"The inconvenient part about working with this product is that it's very heavy, requiring a lot of people and a lot of resources."
"It would be ideal if they could optimize it a bit."
"An area for improvement in Oracle Service Bus is the roadmap for its product launch. Currently, it's unclear, so Oracle should develop a roadmap for version 12c, so people can see what's coming out of that version of Oracle Service Bus. Cloud hosting is an additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of Oracle Service Bus."
"There are times when I select components in composite and they do not appear, and I cannot figure out why."
Aurea CX Messenger is ranked 12th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 7 reviews while Oracle Service Bus is ranked 5th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 25 reviews. Aurea CX Messenger is rated 9.0, while Oracle Service Bus is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Aurea CX Messenger writes "Lightweight and efficient solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Service Bus writes "Enables us to do a lot of aggregation and routing, but API response can be a problem if the payload is heavy". Aurea CX Messenger is most compared with Mule ESB, TIBCO Enterprise Message Service and WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, whereas Oracle Service Bus is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM Integration Bus, webMethods Integration Server, Red Hat Fuse and WSO2 Enterprise Integrator.
See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
