Aurea Sonic MQ vs IBM MQ

Aurea Sonic MQ is ranked 3rd in Business Activity Monitoring with 2 reviews vs IBM MQ which is ranked 1st in Business Activity Monitoring with 79 reviews. The top reviewer of Aurea Sonic MQ writes "User-friendly tool which allows for a seamless approach to performing hotfixes". The top reviewer of IBM MQ writes "When we go to different reports, it queues everything up, waits, and then releases it when we're ready". Aurea Sonic MQ is most compared with IBM MQ, Avada Software Infrared360 and RabbitMQ. IBM MQ is most compared with RabbitMQ, Apache Kafka and Anypoint MQ. See our Aurea Sonic MQ vs IBM MQ report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
+Add products to compare
Most Helpful Review
Aurea sonic mq vs. ibm mq report from it central station 2018 01 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Aurea Sonic MQ vs. IBM MQ and others in Business Activity Monitoring
252,993 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing Aurea Sonic MQ vs IBM MQ

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Aurea sonic mq vs. ibm mq report from it central station 2018 01 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Aurea Sonic MQ vs. IBM MQ and others in Business Activity Monitoring
252,993 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING
Views
1,818
Comparisons
1,038
Reviews
2
Followers
255
Avg. Rating
9.0
Views
12,943
Comparisons
7,516
Reviews
79
Followers
660
Avg. Rating
8.5
Top Comparisons
Top Comparisons
Ibm
Compared 10% of the time.
Pivotal logo
Compared 6% of the time.
See more Aurea Sonic MQ competitors »
Pivotal logo
Compared 20% of the time.
Apache
Compared 12% of the time.
Mulesoft logo
Compared 8% of the time.
See more IBM MQ competitors »
Also Known As
Also Known AsSonic MQWebSphere MQ
Website/Video
Website/VideoAurea
  • Vendor 28822 screenshot 1514654808
IBM
  • Vendor 7400 screenshot 1514653938
OverviewQuestionmark icon
Overview

SonicMQ is a message-oriented middleware (MOM) system that allows diverse applications to communicate through Java Message Service (JMS) messages in a distributed enterprise system. JMS is an industry-standard messaging API, a standard that defines a full set of messaging capability. The SonicMQ JMS implementation offers exceptional reliability, performance, scalability, availability, and security, as well as powerful XML-processing capabilities.
SonicMQ provides full support for JMS Unified Domains, as well as the other standard JMS messaging domains, Point-to-Point (PTP) and Publish-and-Subscribe (Pub/Sub). It guarantees message delivery under all conditions. The loosely coupled, asynchronous data exchange mechanism allows for maximum reliability and flexibility.
The SonicMQ architecture relies on message brokers, each of which manages communications and security for one or more local client applications. Brokers can be located anywhere, according to geographical considerations and business needs. The use of broker clusters can provide load balancing and fault tolerance.
In addition to supporting standard JMS messaging, SonicMQ serves as the foundation for the powerful Sonic ESB application integration framework.

    IBM MQ provides the universal messaging backbone for service-oriented architecture (SOA) connectivity. It connects virtually any commercial IT system, whether on premise, in the cloud, or a mixture. For more than 20 years IBM has led the market in messaging middleware and more than 10,000 businesses across all geographies and industries rely on IBM MQ.

    Visit for your trial here.

Sample Customers
Sample CustomersAir France-KLM, Proximus, Barratt Developments, Freedom MortgageDeutsche Bahn, Bon-Ton, WestJet, ARBURG, Northern Territory Government, Tata Steel Europe, Sharp Corporation
Top IndustriesQuestionmark icon
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm
27%
Insurance Company
20%
Retailer
13%
Healthcare Company
6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm
46%
Insurance Company
16%
Healthcare Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
5%
Company SizeQuestionmark icon
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business
1%
Midsize Enterprise
12%
Large Enterprise
87%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
10%
Midsize Enterprise
5%
Large Enterprise
85%
Aurea sonic mq vs. ibm mq report from it central station 2018 01 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Aurea Sonic MQ vs. IBM MQ and others in Business Activity Monitoring
Download now
252,993 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Business Activity Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email