We performed a comparison between Aurea CX Messenger and VMware RabbitMQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, IBM, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Message Queue (MQ) Software."The features that I have found most valuable are that it is very easy to develop. Most of it is graphical, but we also have the option to add any custom call that you need."
"The solution is highly scalable, this is very important for us. It can handle a lot of messages."
"SDM: User-friendly tool which allows for a seamless approach to performing hotfixes, if required."
"ESB: Provides all kind of possibilities to resolve business needs. A lot of ready to use services plus custom Java services. I used a lot of them all."
"The solution offers excellent stability."
"The Messenger Broker is a really good feature."
"After creating a RabbitMQ service, they provide you with a sort of web management dashboard."
"Simple and straightforward admin portals: Made it easy for users and worked out excellently for our requirements"
"The most valuable feature is asynchronous calls, which are easy to configure."
"The solution has really cool features to use. Its management console is excellent. You can utilize plugins to view the performance of the whole service on one network."
"We use VMware RabbitMQ to transfer information from one point to another."
"The most valuable feature for me is that it is open source. The licensing costs are really low and they are transparent."
"The solution's best feature is its exceptional speed, delivering efficient utilization of resources."
"The most valuable feature is that it's really customizable."
"It should include/add more services with the product as per market demand. It should include custom Java services developed by any organization or provide a platform where users/developers can share ideas/custom services, etc."
"The improvement is that it should be on the cloud and use web services."
"The solution needs to improve support for new, more recent protocols on the API."
"You should not hurry with upgrades without testing the whole product completely."
"I don't know if the last version has the cloud option, but maybe that could be good. That could be something that is included."
"Aurea CX Messenger could improve by making better use of the new APIs"
"The support feature could benefit from some improvement in terms of accessibility and responsiveness."
"Their implementation is quite tricky. It's not that easy to implement RabbitMQ as a cluster."
"I would like to see the performance of the administration portal improved and additional messaging protocols."
"The solution needs improvement on performance."
"The debugging capabilities and testing flexibilities need to be improved."
"When you have complex tasks, RabbitMQ is hard to use."
"They should improve on the ability to scale your queues in a very simple and elegant way with the same power that they have would be great."
"RabbitMQ is clearly better supported on Linux than it is on Windows. There are idiosyncrasies in the Windows version that are not there on Linux."
Aurea CX Messenger is ranked 11th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 7 reviews while VMware RabbitMQ is ranked 5th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 38 reviews. Aurea CX Messenger is rated 9.0, while VMware RabbitMQ is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Aurea CX Messenger writes "Lightweight and efficient solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware RabbitMQ writes "A cloud solution for asynchronous call with easy configuration". Aurea CX Messenger is most compared with Mule ESB, TIBCO Enterprise Message Service and WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, whereas VMware RabbitMQ is most compared with IBM MQ, ActiveMQ, Apache Kafka, Anypoint MQ and Red Hat AMQ.
See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.
We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
