• Home
  • Aurea Sonic XML Server vs. IBM IMS

Aurea Sonic XML Server vs IBM IMS comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Aurea Logo

Aurea Sonic XML Server

10 views|3 comparisons
IBM Logo

IBM IMS

100 views|96 comparisons
Ranking
19th
out of 19 in Non-Relational Databases
Views
10
Comparisons
3
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
7th
out of 19 in Non-Relational Databases
Views
100
Comparisons
96
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
Sonic XML Server
IMS
Learn More
Aurea
Video Not Available
IBM
Overview
Information Not Available
Off-the-shelf warehouse management solution designed to help automate and streamline facility operations.
Sample Customers
Barratt Developments, Heathrow, HomeServe, Paypal, Freedom Mortgage
Nice Céte d'Azur, Ultra Petroleum, Hudson River HealthCare, SRG Global, The Poseidon Project, The City of Edinburgh Council, PotashCorp, ANZ, OTTO, Mingkang Natregro Health Food Group, NASCO, Apria Healthcare, Folksam
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm20%
Government14%
Manufacturing Company8%
Computer Software Company6%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business20%
Midsize Enterprise5%
Large Enterprise75%

Aurea Sonic XML Server is ranked 19th in Non-Relational Databases while IBM IMS is ranked 7th in Non-Relational Databases. Aurea Sonic XML Server is rated 0.0, while IBM IMS is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Aurea Sonic XML Server is most compared with , whereas IBM IMS is most compared with CA IDMS and Adabas.

See our list of best Non-Relational Databases vendors.

We monitor all Non-Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.