• Home
  • Aurea Sonic XML Server vs. Matisse

Aurea Sonic XML Server vs Matisse comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Aurea Logo

Aurea Sonic XML Server

10 views|3 comparisons
Matisse Logo

Matisse

67 views|50 comparisons
Ranking
19th
out of 19 in Non-Relational Databases
Views
10
Comparisons
3
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
12th
out of 19 in Non-Relational Databases
Views
67
Comparisons
50
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
Sonic XML Server
Learn More
Aurea
Video Not Available
Matisse
Video Not Available
Overview
Information Not Available
The database for Web Services. Includes Native Object and XML Support, ANSI SQL Support, no Object-Relational mapping.
Sample Customers
Barratt Developments, Heathrow, HomeServe, Paypal, Freedom Mortgage
ABB, Airbus, AMP, Areva / Cogema, Baan, Bayer, Cap Gemini Ernest & Young, CEA Technology, Deutsche Bank, Dunn & Bradstreet, Ericsson, Fujitsu, Hitachi, IBM Netherlands, NEC, Nokia, Panasonic, Pfizer, Philips, Sanofi, Saudi Aramco, Siemens, Sony Electronics, Tokyo Gas, Tokyo Hospital, Thales Group, UBS Warburg, Unilever Reasearch, University of Gronigen, Vivendi Universal

Aurea Sonic XML Server is ranked 19th in Non-Relational Databases while Matisse is ranked 12th in Non-Relational Databases. Aurea Sonic XML Server is rated 0.0, while Matisse is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Aurea Sonic XML Server is most compared with , whereas Matisse is most compared with Actian NoSQL Object Database.

See our list of best Non-Relational Databases vendors.

We monitor all Non-Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.