Based on our user's reviews, we compared Okta Workforce Identity and Auth0 across several parameters.
Based on the user reviews and considering the overall sentiment, Okta Workforce Identity is preferred over Auth0. Users highly value Okta's seamless integration with various applications and systems, robust security measures, and user-friendly interface. They also appreciate Okta's exceptional customer service and support. While Auth0 also receives positive feedback for its ROI, seamless integration, and user-friendly interface, Okta's customer service and support and its ability to streamline access management processes give it an edge over Auth0.
"The most valuable feature is that it is simple to integrate, irrespective of your codebase."
"It's a very powerful platform. It has the ability to do the usual stuff, according to modern protocols, like OIDC and OAuth 2. But the real benefit of using the platform comes from its flexibility to enhance it with rules and, now, with what they call authentication pipelines. That is the most significant feature, as it allows you to customize everything regarding the authentication and authorization process."
"The most valuable feature is interface application integration, but we haven't fully used it yet. We'll need it in the future for a few potential clients."
"The most valuable feature of the product is scalability."
"It supports identity federation, FSO and multi-tenancy."
"It is easily connected and easy to put our app in single sign-on."
"The valuable features are that it is extremely secure and that it's developer-friendly."
"It has improved our organization by providing login authentication for a mobile app."
"It has a wide range of MFA options. I prefer "Okta Verify" out of them all."
"The most valuable features depend on a customer's needs. Our customers generally find multi-factor authentication very useful."
"The most valuable aspects of the solution are the integration with external websites one-factor authentication."
"One of the most beneficial features of the solution is the user provisioning and the de-provisioning feature."
"The solution can scale very well."
"A solution that's easy to use, stable, and reliable."
"It made things a lot easier, especially with passwords."
"What I found most valuable in Okta Workforce Identity is that it worked together with VMware Workspace One, so there was this device check at the same time. My company used the trusted device method that enabled you to define that only the trusted devices including the Workspace One agent were able to access the applications directly without an additional authentication step."
"The Management API could be improved so it's easier to get user information."
"I think they can do a better job in explaining what you're supposed to do next in order to correctly follow an idiomatic approach to using the solution beyond simply passing a JWT token to a server and having the server check then signature to validate the token."
"There is a possibility to improve the machine-to-machine authentication flow. This part of Auth0 is not really well documented, and we could really gain some additional knowledge on that."
"The product support for multi-tenancy could be improved."
"The product could use a more flexible administration structure"
"This is a costly solution and the price of it should be reduced."
"When they introduced the Organizations feature they did support different login screens per organization. However, they introduced a dependency between this feature and another called the New Universal Login Experience. The New Experience is a more lightweight login screen, but it is much less customizable. For example, today, we are able to fully customize our login screen and even control the background image according to the time of day. We have code to do that. But we are not able to write code anymore in the New Experience."
"There could be easy integration with IoT devices for the product."
"We experienced some technical glitches that need to be resolved."
"They also have single sign-on (SSO). When we bought Okta Workforce Identity a year and a half ago, I was also looking at SSO, but not much documentation was available for SSO. The documentation for SSO should be a little more robust for somebody who is implementing it for the first time."
"The solution should have greater on-premises availability, not just cloud and more package customization in its processing."
"The training is too costly."
"Okta Workforce Identity could improve provisioning it can be made simpler."
"This user integration with the Okta integration network could be simplified."
"In my country, there's a lot of stealing of mobile phones, and mobile phones are the authentication device through the Okta application. If someone should steal my mobile phone, which is very common in my country, he or she might have access to my company account. That's my concern."
"Okta Workforce Identity could improve the way passwords are reset and how it interfaces with Microsoft."
Auth0 is ranked 3rd in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 7 reviews while Okta Workforce Identity is ranked 4th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 24 reviews. Auth0 is rated 8.4, while Okta Workforce Identity is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Auth0 writes "Very easy to set up new SAML and SSO integrations with support for all IDPs including Okta and Azure". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Okta Workforce Identity writes "Extremely easy to work with, simple to set up, and reasonably priced ". Auth0 is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, Amazon Cognito, Frontegg, Cloudflare Access and SAP Customer Data Cloud, whereas Okta Workforce Identity is most compared with Google Cloud Identity, Microsoft Entra ID, SailPoint IdentityIQ, Saviynt and Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy. See our Auth0 vs. Okta Workforce Identity report.
See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors and best Access Management vendors.
We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.