Authentify vs CA Risk Authentication [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Authentify Logo
142 views|111 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Broadcom Logo
views| comparisons
66% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Authentify and CA Risk Authentication [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems.
To learn more, read our detailed Authentication Systems Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
41st
Views
142
Comparisons
111
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Unranked
In Authentication Systems
Buyer's Guide
Authentication Systems
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems. Updated: April 2024.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
xFA
CA RiskMinder
Learn More
Overview
Authentify takes advantage of a smartphone's sensors, processing power, and data channels to offer flexible authentication. It offers an authentication process users will love, eliminates the need to type passwords and defeats keystroke loggers and other threats.

CA Risk Authentication is a powerful risk-based, adaptive authentication solution that works in real time to evaluate context, calculate a risk score, recommend actions and provide alerts/case management. It has a strong set of prebuilt rules to detect risk and an easy-to-use risk management console to adjust parameters or create new rules. The risk engine examines many factors including device identification, geolocation, IP address and user activity to evaluate risk. The calculated risk score is then fed into your policies to decide whether to authorize the current activity, request step-up authentication and/or send an alert or block the activity. This provides your organization with a transparent layer of protection against identity theft, data breaches and fraud. CA Risk Authentication can be used to reduce fraud and protect users from Internet attacks whether they are shopping online or accessing confidential or private information via a Web portal or application. It also provides organizations the ability to enforce different levels of authentication depending on the user activity, transaction value and the calculated risk score.

Sample Customers
Midwestern Bank
Global bank based in the United States
Buyer's Guide
Authentication Systems
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems. Updated: April 2024.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Authentify is ranked 41st in Authentication Systems while CA Risk Authentication [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Authentication Systems. Authentify is rated 8.0, while CA Risk Authentication [EOL] is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Authentify writes "A Better Way to Do Multifactor Authentication with Authentify xFA". On the other hand, the top reviewer of CA Risk Authentication [EOL] writes "If we spot anomalies we can step up authentication. The policy entrance should learn from that state rather than reverting back to what it believes is the static good". Authentify is most compared with , whereas CA Risk Authentication [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.

We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.