Compare Autodesk Moldflow vs. MSC PATRAN

Autodesk Moldflow is ranked 4th in CAE while MSC PATRAN is ranked 2nd in CAE. Autodesk Moldflow is rated 0, while MSC PATRAN is rated 0. On the other hand, Autodesk Moldflow is most compared with ANSYS Computer Aided Engineering and MSC NASTRAN, whereas MSC PATRAN is most compared with MSC NASTRAN and ANSYS Computer Aided Engineering.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Autodesk Moldflow Logo
511 views|260 comparisons
MSC PATRAN Logo
2,054 views|1,911 comparisons
Ranking
4th
out of 4 in CAE
Views
511
Comparisons
260
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
2nd
out of 4 in CAE
Views
2,054
Comparisons
1,911
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Top Comparisons
Compared 33% of the time.
Compared 79% of the time.
Also Known As
MoldflowPATRAN
Learn
Autodesk
MSC
Overview

Engineers and analysts use Moldflow software for plastic injection molding simulation to improve plastic part designs, injection mold designs, and manufacturing processes.

Patran is the world's most widely used pre/post-processing software for Finite Element Analysis (FEA), providing solid modeling, meshing, analysis setup and post-processing for multiple solvers including MSC Nastran, Marc, Abaqus, LS-DYNA, ANSYS, and Pam-Crash.
Offer
Learn more about Autodesk Moldflow
Learn more about MSC PATRAN
Sample Customers
Primera Plastics, Rheomold, Minda Industries Limited, forteq Nidau AG, Automotive Lighting Reutlingen GmbHNASA (JWST-ISIM)
We monitor all CAE reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.