• Home
  • Autodesk Moldflow vs. MSC PATRAN [EOL]

Autodesk Moldflow vs MSC PATRAN [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Autodesk Logo

Autodesk Moldflow

241 views|135 comparisons
Hexagon AB Logo

MSC PATRAN [EOL]

views| comparisons
Ranking
3rd
out of 3 in CAE
Views
241
Comparisons
135
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Unranked
In CAE
Comparisons
Also Known As
Moldflow
PATRAN
Learn More
Autodesk
Hexagon AB
Overview

Engineers and analysts use Moldflow software for plastic injection molding simulation to improve plastic part designs, injection mold designs, and manufacturing processes.

Patran is the world's most widely used pre/post-processing software for Finite Element Analysis (FEA), providing solid modeling, meshing, analysis setup and post-processing for multiple solvers including MSC Nastran, Marc, Abaqus, LS-DYNA, ANSYS, and Pam-Crash.
Sample Customers
Primera Plastics, Rheomold, Minda Industries Limited, forteq Nidau AG, Automotive Lighting Reutlingen GmbH
NASA (JWST-ISIM)
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Manufacturing Company23%
Educational Organization13%
University9%
Computer Software Company7%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise74%

Autodesk Moldflow is ranked 3rd in CAE while MSC PATRAN [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in CAE. Autodesk Moldflow is rated 0.0, while MSC PATRAN [EOL] is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Autodesk Moldflow is most compared with Abaqus and ANSYS Computer Aided Engineering, whereas MSC PATRAN [EOL] is most compared with Abaqus and ANSYS Computer Aided Engineering.

See our list of best CAE vendors.

We monitor all CAE reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.