• Home
  • AutoMate BPA Server [EOL] vs. Everest Blueriq

AutoMate BPA Server [EOL] vs Everest Blueriq comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Fortra Logo

AutoMate BPA Server [EOL]

views| comparisons
Everest Logo

Everest Blueriq

Read 2 Everest Blueriq reviews
256 views|208 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Business Process Management (BPM)
March 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AutoMate BPA Server [EOL] and Everest Blueriq based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM).
To learn more, read our detailed Business Process Management (BPM) Report (Updated: March 2024).
Download the complete report
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use AutoMate BPA Server [EOL]?
ChrisBiemans
Stable platform with valuable case management capabilities
report
See Which Vendors Are Best For You
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
See Recommendations
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Everest Blueriq?
Top Answer:The biggest benefit of using the product is identifying the issues, enabling a more flexible working method.
What needs improvement with Everest Blueriq?
Top Answer:The platform's initial setup process could be better.
What is your primary use case for Everest Blueriq?
Top Answer:We use Everest Blueriq for a food safety organization, that revolves around automating and managing complex processes critical to ensuring food safety and compliance. It involves monitoring containers… more »
Ranking
Unranked
In Business Process Management (BPM)
33rd
out of 93 in Business Process Management (BPM)
Views
256
Comparisons
208
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
282
Rating
8.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
Blueriq, Aquima
Learn More
Fortra
Everest
Video Not Available
Overview
AutoMate is an automation platform for Windows. It is multi-tiered, meaning it logically separates high-level workflow design from the complexity of building detailed automation routines. It provides centralized control over event-driven automation routines involving one machine or the entire enterprise and enables organizations to streamline processes that rely on a diverse IT infrastructure.
Blueriq is the software platform for organizations with knowledge-based, rule-driven business processes. By modeling these processes in one central area, automate and integrate, you can respond quickly to changes, creating the ultimate customer experience and streamline your services.
Sample Customers
Gorgias Press, InfraSource, PSCU Financial Services, California's Saddleback Memorial Medical Center
Abn Amro, Aegon, duo, City of Tilburg
Buyer's Guide
Business Process Management (BPM)
March 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM). Updated: March 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.

AutoMate BPA Server [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Business Process Management (BPM) while Everest Blueriq is ranked 33rd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews. AutoMate BPA Server [EOL] is rated 0.0, while Everest Blueriq is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Everest Blueriq writes "Stable platform with valuable case management capabilities ". AutoMate BPA Server [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Everest Blueriq is most compared with Pega BPM.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.