• Home
  • AutoMate BPA Server [EOL] vs. Flux

AutoMate BPA Server [EOL] vs Flux comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Fortra Logo

AutoMate BPA Server [EOL]

views| comparisons
Flux Logo

Flux

Read 2 Flux reviews
82 views|72 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Buyer's Guide
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
March 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AutoMate BPA Server [EOL] and Flux based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Progress Software, BMC, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT).
To learn more, read our detailed Managed File Transfer (MFT) Report (Updated: March 2024).
Download the complete report
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use AutoMate BPA Server [EOL]?
Anonymous User
User-friendly, extensible product with great customer support. Would like better support for multiple workflows.
Ranking
Unranked
In Managed File Transfer (MFT)
35th
out of 42 in Managed File Transfer (MFT)
Views
82
Comparisons
72
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
March 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Progress Software, BMC, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT). Updated: March 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Learn More
Fortra
Flux
Overview
AutoMate is an automation platform for Windows. It is multi-tiered, meaning it logically separates high-level workflow design from the complexity of building detailed automation routines. It provides centralized control over event-driven automation routines involving one machine or the entire enterprise and enables organizations to streamline processes that rely on a diverse IT infrastructure.

Flexible, integrated solution to meet highly complex processing needs with job scheduling, batch processor, and managed file transfer.

Flux automates batch processes into comprehensive workflows. Flux's batch job scheduling runs reports, triggers database jobs, runs Java code, executes ETL processes, transfers files, and runs command lines or shell scripts. Flux integrates batch job scheduling, managed file transfer, database queries and stored procedures, web services, and error handling to automate your batch job scheduling needs.

Sample Customers
Gorgias Press, InfraSource, PSCU Financial Services, California's Saddleback Memorial Medical Center
MetLife DHL Express The Clearing House Payments Company ADP Bank of New York Mellon Conway, Inc Carnegie Mellon University
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm23%
Manufacturing Company16%
Computer Software Company11%
Healthcare Company8%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise6%
Large Enterprise81%
Buyer's Guide
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
March 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Progress Software, BMC, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT). Updated: March 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

AutoMate BPA Server [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Managed File Transfer (MFT) while Flux is ranked 35th in Managed File Transfer (MFT). AutoMate BPA Server [EOL] is rated 0.0, while Flux is rated 10.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Flux writes "User-friendly, extensible product with great customer support. Would like better support for multiple workflows". AutoMate BPA Server [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Flux is most compared with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform.

See our list of best Managed File Transfer (MFT) vendors and best Workload Automation vendors.

We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.