Automaton vs CrossBrowserTesting comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Torry Harris Integration Solutions Logo
112 views|84 comparisons
SmartBear Logo
1,326 views|987 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Automaton and CrossBrowserTesting based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The lowest price point is very reasonable. It is also useful if only one person in the company needs to check on the browser display."
  • "A few intermediary pricing options for small QA teams would be nice, e.g., unlimited screenshots, "as you need it" parallel tests, etc."
  • "CrossBrowserTesting offered the best value for its price."
  • "It is worth the pricing as the product is supported on multiple platforms and browsers."
  • "SmartBear offers bundles of products that work together."
  • More CrossBrowserTesting Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Ranking
    41st
    Views
    112
    Comparisons
    84
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    27th
    Views
    1,326
    Comparisons
    987
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    Functional Testing Tools
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    An illustrative test automation tool with a code-less approach towards end-to-end application testing. Visual flow-based approaches for test cases makes it tester-friendly.

    Automaton is a test automation tool. Automaton uses a visual flowchart-based design interface. It enables end to end continuous test automation of all components in application development - Web, APIs, Logs and Database Processes/Operations.

    With no-code interface, users without any coding knowledge can run the application. It comes with a rich set of APIs that helps Automaton to integrate with popular CI tools like Jenkins.

    Available as a SaaS offering, for On-Premise deployments and in a hybrid model.

    Key Features

    1. Data-Driven Testing
    Upload bulk credentials through a single CSV file.

    2. Regression Testing
    Take a big leap from execution planning to the creation of regression plans.

    3. Reusability
    Access reusable test steps while executing the new test case.

    4. Collaboration
    Test cases and steps can be duplicated and shared with other users within the group.

    5. No-Code Testing
    Codeless testing automation is powered by flowchart-based UI.

    6. UX & Usability
    Configurable GUI and CLI enable users to handle most complex test cases easily.

    7. Easy to Use
    Intuitive UI and support documentation help the users to understand the tool quickly.

      CrossBrowserTesting is a cloud testing platform that gives instant access to 1500+ different real desktop and mobile browsers for testers, developers, and designers.

      • Native debugging tools make manual testing easy to inspect and correct HTML, CSS, and JavaScript errors on any browser.
      • Take automated screenshots across multiple browsers at once, then compare side-by-side against historical test runs.
      Sample Customers
      Schneider Electric, Orange, O2, IBM, JPMorgan Chase
      St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Accenture, Sony, Los Angeles Times, ADP, Verizon, T-Mobile, Wistia
      Top Industries
      No Data Available
      REVIEWERS
      Financial Services Firm21%
      Healthcare Company14%
      Computer Software Company14%
      University7%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Computer Software Company18%
      Financial Services Firm14%
      Government10%
      Healthcare Company7%
      Company Size
      No Data Available
      REVIEWERS
      Small Business35%
      Midsize Enterprise22%
      Large Enterprise43%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Small Business23%
      Midsize Enterprise16%
      Large Enterprise61%
      Buyer's Guide
      Functional Testing Tools
      April 2024
      Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
      768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

      Automaton is ranked 41st in Functional Testing Tools while CrossBrowserTesting is ranked 27th in Functional Testing Tools. Automaton is rated 0.0, while CrossBrowserTesting is rated 9.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of CrossBrowserTesting writes "Static screenshots are the feature most often used, because they are a simple method of detecting problems". Automaton is most compared with Appvance IQ, whereas CrossBrowserTesting is most compared with BrowserStack, Bitbar, Tricentis Tosca, LambdaTest and Sauce Labs.

      See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

      We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.